Neurol India Home 
 

VIDEO SECTION-OPERATIVE NUANCES: STEP BY STEP
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 592--594

Bilateral Lambdoid and Sagittal Craniosynostosis with Hydrocephalus: ETV, Bifrontal Craniotomy, Anterior Cranial Vault Remodeling, and Posterior Cranial Vault Expansion

Subhas Konar, Dhaval Shukla 
 Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, Karnataka, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Dhaval Shukla
Department of Neurosurgery, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore - 560 029, Karnataka
India

Abstract

Background: Bilateral lambdoid and sagittal craniosynostosis (BLSS), also known as Mercedes Benz pattern craniosynostosis, is a rare form of craniosynostosis. The whole cranial vault remodeling gives the best result. Objective: To describe the role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and whole cranial vault remodeling for treatment of BLSS. Material and Methods: Surgical technique/procedure: A single-sitting three-step surgery was performed for a 7-month-old child who had BLSS and hydrocephalus. First ETV and anterior cranial vault remodeling were done in the supine position. The posterior cranial vault expansion was done in the prone position. Results and Conclusions: The ventricle volume reduced at follow-up and the frontal bossing also reduced. The whole cranial vault remodeling gives the best result for BLSS.



How to cite this article:
Konar S, Shukla D. Bilateral Lambdoid and Sagittal Craniosynostosis with Hydrocephalus: ETV, Bifrontal Craniotomy, Anterior Cranial Vault Remodeling, and Posterior Cranial Vault Expansion.Neurol India 2021;69:592-594


How to cite this URL:
Konar S, Shukla D. Bilateral Lambdoid and Sagittal Craniosynostosis with Hydrocephalus: ETV, Bifrontal Craniotomy, Anterior Cranial Vault Remodeling, and Posterior Cranial Vault Expansion. Neurol India [serial online] 2021 [cited 2021 Sep 20 ];69:592-594
Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2021/69/3/592/319204


Full Text



Bilateral lambdoid and sagittal craniosynostosis (BLSS), also known as Mercedes Benz pattern craniosynostosis, is a rare form of craniosynostosis.[1],[2],[3],[4],[5] The whole cranial vault remodeling gives the best result. This type of craniosynostosis may be associated with hydrocephalus and Chiari 1 malformation. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) has been described for the treatment of hydrocephalus.[6],[7]

 Objective



To describe ETV, bifrontal craniotomy, anterior cranial vault remodeling, and posterior cranial vault expansion for BLSS in a case of a 7-month-old child.

 Procedure



The child underwent surgery under general anesthesia in the supine position with head neutral. A zigzag bicoronal scalp incision was made and supraperiosteal dissection was done exposing both frontal bones till 1 cm superior to orbital rims. A precoronal burr hole was made and an external ventricular catheter was inserted, and ICP was monitored for 5 min. Then, using Gaab universal neuroendoscope, standard ETV was done. Bifrontal craniotomy was done. The anteroposterior length of the bifrontal bone was reduced by 1 cm by removing a strip of bone posteriorly. Then, the bifrontal bone flap was fixed both anteriorly and posteriorly to the skull thus reducing the frontal bossing.

The child was turned prone and a linear scalp incision was made from vertex to suboccipital region. Bilateral parietooccipital craniotomy was done, limited by a large emissary vein posteriorly. The posterior bone flap was hinged loosely to the suboccipital bone allowing posterior expansion.

Wounds were closed in two layers.

Video link: https://youtu.be/aHFMEYEoI3o

QR Code: [INLINE:1]

Video timeline with audio transcript (Minutes)

This is a case of BLSS with hydrocephalus.

00:08: The coronal suture was open and was widely separated. Other major sutures were fused resulting in crowding in the posterior compartment of the cranial vault and hydrocephalus.

00:20: The surgery was done in the supine position with the elevation of the bifrontal scalp flap supraperiosteally. A precoronal burr hole was made and the ventricle punctured. The ICP monitoring showed an ICP of 14 mmHg, which is on the higher side for a 7-month-old child.

01:10: Trocar and endoscope sheath was placed in the ventricle and the third ventriculostomy was done. You can see that the stoma is being dilated. The basilar artery with perforators could be visualized through the stoma.

01:30: After ETV, bifrontal skull flap was marked and a bifrontal craniotomy was done. A 1 cm strip of bone posterior to the coronal suture was removed. The dura was coagulated to decrease the anteroposterior diameter of the skull and reduce the frontal bossing. Barrel staff cuts were made on the frontal skull flap. As the bone was soft, the contouring of the bone was done. It was replaced and tied with sutures, both anteriorly as well as posteriorly. You can see that the bifrontal bossing has significantly reduced after tying the skull flap.

02:47: The child was turned prone. A midline incision was made from the vertex to the suboccipital region. The supraperiosteal dissection was done taking care of the emissary vein, in the inferior part of the incision. Bilateral occipital craniotomy was done above the level of the transverse sinus. Barrel staff cuts were made in the radial direction in the bilateral occipital bone flap. It was hinged to the suboccipital bone for cranial vault expansion posteriorly. The postop scan showed a reduction in bifrontal bossing and expansion of the posterior cranial vault. At follow-up, the MRI showed a reduction in hydrocephalus.

Outcome

The cosmetic outcome was satisfactory. The ventricular volume and frontal bossing reduced at 6 months of follow-up. The growth and development of child was at par with his age.

Pearls and pitfalls

Surgery in two different positions for frontal bossing and posterior cranial vault expansion provides a wider exposure without undue stretching of the scalp flap. The BLSS results in increased intracranial volume due to hydrocephalus; an ETV can help reduce hydrocephalus and prevent frontal bossing.

 Discussion



The BLSS is relatively rare form of craniosynostosis, and there is no consensus regarding the most appropriate management of this condition. Many surgeons feel that the entire procedure could be performed via a single bicoronal incision with the patient in the modified sphinx prone position. We have attempted this earlier for other synostosis but have found ergonomic difficulties, hence prefer to do it in stages in different positions. Alternative options such as endoscopic approaches for synostectomy are also available. However, we have experienced inferior outcomes with limited procedures. We prefer to do complete cranial vault remodeling for craniosynostosis. However, more extensive surgery may incur more blood loss, blood product transfusions, operative time, length of stay, and complications.

We use methods to mitigate bleeding and blood loss like a preoperative iron supplement and intraoperative tranexamic acid infusion. In this case, there were no significant changes in hemodynamic parameters. We could complete the proposed surgery uneventfully. Recently, virtual surgical planning and premade sterile cutting guides, customized in advance for the individual synostosis patient, have enhanced this approach even further in terms of safety, efficiency, and accuracy of the reconstruction. We do not use this technology as of now though have considered it for complex craniosynostosis. In the case of BLSS, there may be persistent posterior fossa crowding and there may be a need for additional surgery for craniocervical decompression later. In our case, additional surgery was not required.

 Conclusions



The whole cranial vault remodeling gives the best result for BLSS, and the addition of ETV at the time of first surgery obviates the need for CSF diversion and treatment of Chiari malformation later.

Declaration of patient consent

”A full and detailed consent from the patient/guardian has been taken. The patient's identity has been adequately anonymized. If anything related to the patient's identity is shown, adequate consent has been taken from the patient/relative/guardian. The journal will not be responsible for any medico-legal issues arising out of issues related to patient's identity or any other issues arising from the public display of the video.” The journal reserves the right to withdraw or pull out the video at any point of time without providing any reason whatsoever.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Shukla D. Mercedes Benz craniosynostosis. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2016;7:176.
2Pillai S, Cochrane D, Singhal A, Steinbok P. Bilateral lambdoid and posterior sagittal craniosynostosis-Management, evolution, and outcome. Child's Nerv Syst 2013;29:2117-21.
3Sadashiva N, Bindu PS, Santosh V, Devi BI, Shukla D. Mucopolysaccharidosis type I with craniosynostosis. Neurol India 2015;63:612-5.
4Hing AV, Click ES, Holder U, Seto ML, Vessey K, Gruss J, et al. Bilateral lambdoid and sagittal synostosis (BLSS): A unique craniosynostosis syndrome or predictable craniofacial phenotype? Am J Med Genet A 2009;149A: 1024-32.
5Rhodes JL, Kolar JC, Fearon JA. Mercedes Benz pattern craniosynostosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125:299-304.
6James G, Thompson DNP. Cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in craniosynostosis. Pediatric Hydrocephalus. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 1083-106.
7Di Rocco F, Jucá CE, Arnaud E, Renier D, Sainte-Rose C. The role of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of hydrocephalus associated with faciocraniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2010;6:17-22.