Neurol India Home 
 

NI FEATURE: CENTS (CONCEPTS, ERGONOMICS, NUANCES, THERBLIGS, SHORTCOMINGS) - COMMENTARY
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 67  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 125--134

Magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonogram findings in upper limb peripheral neuropathies

Ankita Aggarwal1, Manisha Jana1, Deep N Srivastava1, Raju Sharma1, Shivanand Gamanagatti1, Atin Kumar1, Vijay Kumar2, Rajesh Malhotra2, Kanwaljeet Garg3,  
1 Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Orthopedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
3 Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Deep N Srivastava
Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi - 110 029
India

Abstract

Peripheral neuropathy is defined as any disease or damage to the peripheral nerves. Imaging modalities are emerging as a complementary tool of choice for diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies. This has been made possible by the advent of high-resolution ultrasound, higher field strength magnets, better surface array coils, and superior software. In addition, imaging plays a pivotal role in deciding the management. They help in determining the continuity and course of the nerve, thereby helping in the pre-surgical mapping of nerve. Imaging studies also help in prognosticating the recovery by determining the event to be acute or chronic. This article describes the imaging findings of various neuropathies affecting upper limb peripheral nerves, broadly categorized as traumatic and non-traumatic. The non-traumatic group is further divided as entrapment, infective, inflammatory and tumors.



How to cite this article:
Aggarwal A, Jana M, Srivastava DN, Sharma R, Gamanagatti S, Kumar A, Kumar V, Malhotra R, Garg K. Magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonogram findings in upper limb peripheral neuropathies.Neurol India 2019;67:125-134


How to cite this URL:
Aggarwal A, Jana M, Srivastava DN, Sharma R, Gamanagatti S, Kumar A, Kumar V, Malhotra R, Garg K. Magnetic resonance neurography and ultrasonogram findings in upper limb peripheral neuropathies. Neurol India [serial online] 2019 [cited 2022 Aug 17 ];67:125-134
Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2019/67/7/125/250701


Full Text



Peripheral neuropathy is defined as any disease or damage to the peripheral nerves. Though the diagnosis is predominantly clinical (which includes history, clinical examination, and electrodiagnostic tests),[1] the role of imaging studies is increasing for various reasons. Imaging provides the spatial resolution of the nerve and helps to determine the primary pathology. It gives the exact site of pathology with a high-resolution depiction of nerves. It establishes the continuity of the nerve and prognosticates the management by determining the event to be acute or chronic. The primary modalities available for nerve imaging are a high-frequency ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). With the advent of highly focused ultrasound, high tesla MRI scanners and dedicated coils, the specificity and sensitivity of these modalities for establishing the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathies have increased manifold. In the current article, we will limit ourselves to the discussion of peripheral neuropathies involving the upper limb.

 Imaging Modalities



Ultrasonogram

For imaging of nerves, high-frequency ultrasound is required (usually above 12–14 Hz). Evaluation with ultrasound gives a flexible field of view and the pathological site can be readily compared to the normal site. The entire extent of the nerve can be assessed in one go in a short duration of time and multifocal pathologies can also be picked. Ultrasonogram (USG) is cheap and far more convenient to the patient. It also allows for real-time dynamic imaging. However, it depends on the operator's skill. In addition, its sensitivity markedly decreases in conditions of dense scarring and calcification or when the nerve is very deep-seated.

Magnetic resonance imaging

MRI has a very high inherent soft tissue contrast; thus, it detects subtle signal abnormalities on T2-weighted (T2W) sequence. Hence, MRI is more specific and sensitive than ultrasound in detecting peripheral neuropathies.[2]

The interobserver and intraobserver variation is significantly low with MRI and provides more objective assessment, unlike USG. Additionally, secondary muscle denervation changes are better depicted on MR examinations (which has a role in deciding the management).[3]

Muscle atrophy with fatty replacement signifies chronic denervation and either conservative management or tendon transfer would be the treatment of choice. On the other hand, in acute denervation, the patient is managed aggressively to revert the changes. However, MRI is an expensive investigation and requires a longer duration than a USG. Moreover, only a limited region can be evaluated at a time. Thus, the chances of missing a multifocal or bilateral pathology are higher.

 Technique



Ultrasonogram

A high-frequency linear transducer (12–14 Hz) should be used for evaluation of peripheral nerves. The entire course of the nerve should be screened to detect a multifocal pathology and comparison should be done with the other limb.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Higher strength scanners (3T) should be preferred along with dedicated surface coil for better signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The MR neurography (MRN) protocol should include T1 weighted spin echo (T1 W SE) and T2 weighted fat-saturated (T2 W FS) sequences in the axial plane and isovoxel 3-dimensional T2 weighted fat-saturated (3D T2FS) sequence, which can be utilized for making reformats in a coronal and sagittal plane. Axial plane is best for delineating the normal course of the nerve and to detect any subtle pathology, whereas reformats aid in the pre-surgical mapping of the nerve for the surgeon. Newer sequences like diffusion-weighted imaging with background suppression (DWIBS) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) are being increasingly used these days, essentially for response assessment.[2]

Appearance of normal nerve

Using a high-frequency ultrasound, the nerve appears as a smooth round-to-ovoid, iso-to a mildly hyperechoic structure having a fascicular pattern in a cross-sectional view. It usually accompanies a vessel along, which can be easily distinguished by putting the color flow. It can be distinguished from a muscle or tendon by tracing the nerve in its proximal or distal course. In sagittal orientation, the nerve appears as a bundle of longitudinal fibers packed in a sheath [Figure 1].{Figure 1}

T1W sequence is best to evaluate the morphology of the nerve on MRI. It is isointense to muscles, round-to-ovoid smooth structure having intrafascicular fat and surrounded by a thin rim of perineural fat. The peripheral nerves are typically seen in the interfacial plane between the muscles accompanying a vessel [Figure 2]. On fluid sensitive fat-suppressed T2W sequence, the nerve is isointense to mildly hyperintense to the surrounding muscles. Various curved reformats can be made to depict the entire extent of the nerve by acquiring isovoxel 3D sequences.{Figure 2}

Radiological features suggesting abnormality in a nerve

Abnormal signal intensity/echogenicity of the nerve

The nerve is abnormal when it becomes hypoechoic on USG or abnormally T2 hyperintense on MRI as the nerve fascicles tend to gain fluid signal [Figure 3]a. Various theories have been proposed for such an appearance-like vascular congestion, blockade of axoplasmic flow leading to abnormal proximal accumulation of endoneurial fluid, and distal Wallerian degeneration changes.[4] When the disease is severe, the nerve becomes hypointense on T2 at the site of pathology and hyperintense both proximal and distal to it. This is known as the triple B sign (bright, black, and bright).[2]{Figure 3}

Abnormal morphology of the nerve

The normal fascicular pattern of the nerve can be visualized on MRN. The nerve loses its fascicular pattern when it becomes pathological. The surrounding perineural fat can also become scarred or effaced or inflamed in neuropathy.

Change in the caliber of the nerve

The nerve usually becomes enlarged to form a neuroma at the site of pathology, as the fibers tend to regenerate by growing in all directions. The nerve can also show atrophy distal to the site of pathology.

Loss of continuity of the nerve

This usually occurs in traumatic neuropathy when the nerve gets transected either partially or completely, thereby leading to a gap between the transected ends.

Associated surrounding inflammation

This is usually encountered in traumatic neuropathy wherein there is adjacent T2 hyperintensity with loss of normal architecture of soft tissue around the nerve.

Denervation

Group of muscles supplied by a nerve show changes of denervation when their supplying nerve is pathological. When the injury is acute, there is edema in muscles seen as T2 hyperintensity [Figure 3]b. When it is subacute, it shows both changes of edema and beginning of fatty infiltration. When the injury had occurred in the remote past, there is atrophy of muscles with fatty infiltration.

Low fractional anisotropy

Recent studies have established the role of DTI in peripheral neuropathy. Any normal nerve would have a high fractional anisotropy (FA) value as they show increased free water diffusion in one direction. Any disruption or injury to the nerve would restrict this directional preference of diffusion leading to a reduction in FA values. Normalization of FA value post-treatment indicates recovery. Thus, DTI plays a pivotal role in response assessment.[5]

Apparent diffusion coefficient values

Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values help to differentiate malignant and benign nerve sheath tumors. Benign tumors depict ADC values in the range of 1.1–2 × 10-3 mm2/s whereas malignant tumors depict values ranging from 0.7–1.1 × 10-3 mm2/s. In addition, a serial increase of ADC values post-treatment indicates recovery, thereby helping in response assessment.[5]

 Course of Major Nerves



Median nerve

The median nerve is one of the major peripheral nerves of the brachial plexus formed by the median root of the medial cord and lateral root of the lateral cord, containing fibers from all the roots (C5-T1). It descends in the arm in close relation to the brachial artery, lateral to it in the upper arm then crosses in the mid-arm to run medial to the artery in the lower arm, lying superficial to the brachial muscle. It courses between the two heads of pronator teres to enter the anterior compartment of the forearm via the cubital fossa. In the upper forearm, the median nerve gives its major muscular branch, anterior interosseous nerve. Thereafter, it runs between flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis to finally enter the carpal tunnel under the flexor retinaculum. Before entering the carpal tunnel, it gives off a superficial palmar branch. In the palm, it divides into multiple muscular and digital branches [Figure 4].{Figure 4}

Ulnar nerve

The ulnar nerve is another major peripheral nerve of the upper limb arising from the medial cord of the brachial plexus having fibers from C8, T1. It courses on the medial side of the arm in the anterior compartment. At the junction of upper two-third and lower one-third of the arm, it pierces the medial intermuscular septum to enter the posterior compartment. It crosses posterior to the medial epicondyle (cubital tunnel) to enter the forearm. In the proximal forearm, it again enters the anterior compartment by coursing between the two head of flexor carpi ulnaris. Thereafter, it runs medially superficial to flexor carpi ulnaris. It enters the palm superficial to the carpal tunnel in the Guyon canal. It terminates by dividing into superficial and deep branches in the palm [Figure 5].[1],[6]{Figure 5}

Radial nerve

The radial nerve is the third major peripheral nerve of the brachial plexus arising from the posterior cord from fibers C5-T1. It exits the axilla by coursing dorsal to the brachial artery runs between lateral and medial bellies of the triceps muscle. Thereafter, it runs deep, at the surface of the humerus in the spiral (radial) groove, to come to the posterolateral aspect of the arm. At the junction of upper two-third and lower one-third of the arm, the nerve pierces the intermuscular septum to enter the anterior compartment of the arm. It enters the cubital fossa laterally to reach the forearm by piercing the supinator muscle (subsequently called the posterior interosseous nerve). Before piercing the intermuscular septum, the radial nerve gives off the superficial radial nerve which courses superficially with the radial nerve to supply the dorsum of palm. Posterior interosseous nerve enters the posterior compartment to supply its muscles [Figure 6].{Figure 6}

Classification of neuropathy

The median, radial, and ulnar nerves may be affected by various peripheral neuropathies, each of which may be categorized according to its cause, as:

Traumatic neuropathyNontraumatic neuropathy

EntrapmentInfectiveInflammatoryTumor.

Traumatic neuropathy

Peripheral nerve is a collection of axonal fibers surrounded by myelin sheath, which help in the transfer of information from the brain and spinal cord to the rest of the body. These nerves are fragile and can be easily damaged by trauma. The various modes of trauma include sharp cut injury, blunt trauma as in laceration or contusion, iatrogenic or electrical injury, etc. The myelin sheath surrounding the axon is called endoneurium and is composed of Schwann cells and loose connective tissue. Multiple such axons combine to form fascicles, which are surrounded by another connective tissue covering called the perineurium. Multiple such fascicles are further surrounded by loose connective tissue called the epineurium.[7]

Depending on the severity of injury, nerve injuries are classified by Seddon as neuropraxia (when there is damage to myelin with maintained axonal length), axonotmesis (damage to axonal fibers with maintained myelin or connective tissue sheath), and neurotmesis (when there is disruption of axonal fibers with damage to myelin or connective tissue sheath).[8] Neuropraxia is the milder form of injury which recovers by itself, hence conservative management is recommended for this form of injury. Axonotmesis is a relatively severe form of injury, in which the axon undergoes Wallerian degeneration. A good recovery with time is expected with conservative management in such cases. On the other hand, neurotmesis is the most severe form of injury, which requires surgical management and has a dismal prognosis as it involves complete discontinuity of axons and the myelin sheath.

Any nerve injury can lead to neuroma formation, which is a bunch of disorganized neural tissue along with fibrosis. This neuroma is called 'neuroma in continuity' when the continuity of the nerve is maintained [Figure 7]. It can be of spindle shape (if it occurs centrally and is having an intact perineurium) or may be a lateral neuroma (if it is present eccentrically after partial discontinuity of the perineurium occurs). When the neuroma occurs in a completely transacted nerve, it forms an end neuroma [Figure 8]. MRI can aid in differentiating between axonotmesis and neurotmesis on the basis of nerve and muscle signal intensity characteristics at different time intervals after the nerve injury.[9]{Figure 7}{Figure 8}

A major role of imaging (USG and MRI) in traumatic neuropathies is to correctly determine the exact site of involvement. Imaging studies also help in establishing the continuity of the nerve. If the nerve is discontinuous, it is possible to determine if there is neuroma formation. The type of neuroma can also be ascertained. The gap between the two ends of a completely transacted nerve can be determined. It is also helpful in surgical planning — whether primary nerve repair will be possible or nerve reconstruction with grafting will be required. Nerve injuries, if managed early, can prevent a permanent disability.

Entrapment neuropathies

Peripheral nerves are prone to get compressed at the following sites: (a) When they course through the fibro-osseous or fibromuscular tunnel, (b) while piercing through the muscle, (c) when some anatomic variation is seen, (d) when the retinacula or the fibrous tissue thickens either due to overuse or because of age-related degeneration, (e) due to adjoining mass lesion (ganglion, synovial cyst, and tumors), or fractures or dislocation.[10],[11] Various clinical entities are described according to the site of compression of the nerve.

The main role of imaging in entrapment neuropathies is to determine the exact site of compression as neurophysiological studies only give an approximate idea of the location of compression. It is also possible to find the cause of entrapment to determine the feasibility of surgical intervention, e.g., if any mass lesion or a thickened retinacula causes compression of the nerve.

 Examples of Entrapment Neuropathies



Median nerve

Median nerve can get entrapped at the supracondylar region of distal humerus (named the supracondylar process syndrome) due to the presence of an osseous spur arising from the anteromedial surface of distal end of the humerus.[12] This is a very rare site of entrapment with an incidence rate of 0.5%. A fibrous band, called the ligament of Struthers, may be seen joining this osseous spur (supracondylar process) and the medial epicondyle, thereby forming a fibro-osseous tunnel in which the nerve gets entrapped.[13]

Pronator syndrome

Distally, the nerve can get entrapped between the two heads of pronator teres;[14],[15] or beneath the biceps aponeurosis which is called lacertus fibrosis; or, by the thickened proximal edge of flexor digitorum superficialis when it enters the forearm, which is called as the pronator syndrome. Patients typically complain of forearm pain which worsens with pronation/supination.[14] Rarely, the median nerve may get entrapped under the sublime bridge (tendinous arch between the radial and humeral heads of the flexor digitorum superficialis).[16]

Carpal tunnel syndrome

Carpal tunnel forms the most common entrapment neuropathy of the upper limb, having a prevalence of 3%. The compression of the median nerve when it enters the palm beneath the flexor retinaculum in the carpal tunnel is called carpal tunnel syndrome. This occurs whenever the pressure within the carpal tunnel increases. This may be due to systemic disorders like diabetes and hypothyroidism, or due to the presence of a mass either within the nerve or in the surrounding vicinity like a ganglion, cyst, lipoma, heterotopic calcification, fibrolipomatous hamartoma, etc.[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22] Patients present with classical clinical complaints of pain and paresthesia involving the radial three and a half fingers with associated thenar muscle atrophy. Diagnosis is usually clinical and imaging is required to evaluate the cause. Various parameters to diagnose this entrapment neuropathy include the flattening ratio (ratio of longitudinal to short axis diameter of median nerve at the level of hook of hamate) being greater than 3, bowing index (ratio of perpendicular distance of mid of flexor retinaculum from the line joining tubercle of trapezium and hook of hamate to the distance between tubercle of trapezium and hook of hamate) being greater than 0.14, and an abnormal T2 hyperintensity of the median nerve both proximal and distal to site of compression [Figure 9]. In addition, there is denervation of thenar muscles supplied by the median nerve.[2]{Figure 9}

Ulnar nerve

Cubital tunnel

This is the second most common upper limb compressive neuropathy, where the ulnar nerve is pathologically compressed beneath the cubital retinaculum, also called Osborne ligament (fibrous band connecting the medial epicondyle to olecranon process).[11],[23],[24],[25] Multiple studies have been done to evaluate MR findings in ulnar nerve compression at the elbow which demonstrate increased caliber and altered signal intensity in symptomatic patients.[26],[27],[28],[29] However, the nerve may normally show mild T2 hyperintensity at this level. Role of MR is predominantly to look for secondary causes in symptomatic patients.[30] The ulnar nerve can also get compressed under the arcuate ligament when it crosses the two heads of flexor carpi ulnaris muscle.[31]

Guyon canal

Guyon canal syndrome is a result of compression of the ulnar nerve in the piso-hamate tunnel. This canal is present at the level of the wrist and is formed by pisiform and flexor carpi ulnaris medially. The hook of hamate, extrinsic flexor tendons, and transverse carpal ligament form the lateral wall while the roof is formed by the palmar carpal ligament (with palmaris brevis, if present), and the floor by flexor retinaculum, flexor digitorum profundus, transverse carpal ligament, piso-hamate, piso-metacarpal ligaments, and opponens digiti minimi. Causes of compression of the nerve at this level could be due to the presence of lesions like a cyst, lipoma, ganglion, accessory muscles [Figure 10], and vascular lesions.[32],[33],[34],[35],[36],[37],[38],[39],[40],[41],[42]{Figure 10}

Radial nerve

The radial nerve can get entrapped proximally in the axilla and arm, or distally after its division in the forearm. The most common cause of entrapment in the arm is due to fracture of the humerus at the junction of the mid and distal third of the humerus.

Radial tunnel syndrome

The nerve gets entrapped at the elbow. Various causes of this condition are a fibrous band attached to the radiocapitellar joint, the tendinous origin of extensor carpi radialis brevis, or due to the radial recurrent vessel.[43]

Supinator syndrome

It refers to the entrapment of radial nerve at the level of the proximal forearm when it courses through the arcade of Frohse, piercing the supinator muscle, and is the commonest site of entrapment. Other potential sites of compression are at the anterior capsule of the radiocapitellar joint, small recurrent vessels that cross the posterior interosseous nerve (leash of Henry), the fibrous edge of the extensor carpi radialis brevis, and the distal margin of the supinator muscle, where the posterior interosseous nerve exits the supinator tunnel.[44],[45] It is usually the posterior interosseous nerve of the radial nerve which gets compressed in supinator syndrome [Figure 11]. Since posterior interosseous nerve is a pure motor nerve, hence patient presents with wrist drop and finger drop without any sensory loss.[1],[46]{Figure 11}

 Infective Neuropathies



Various viral and bacterial infectious agents may cause neuropathy in which the clinical symptoms mimic those of a focal nerve disturbance. Amongst the bacterial infections, leprosy, tuberculosis, and diphtheria can involve the peripheral nerves. Amongst the viral infections, the most common infectious agents include human immunodeficiency virus, varicella-zoster virus, herpes simplex virus, poliomyelitis virus, and cytomegalovirus.[1]

In such cases, long segment nerve thickening with abscess formation may be seen. In addition, the presence of nodes at the local site also point towards an infective etiology [Figure 12].{Figure 12}

 Inflammatory Neuropathies



Inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathies are immune-mediated neuropathies characterized by multiple foci of demyelination and axonal degeneration of peripheral nerves. The entity chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) has not been evaluated much in the past by imaging.[47],[48],[49] On MRI, this condition would predominantly involve the proximal nerves and may have thickening or altered signal of roots or cords of the brachial plexus. There can be involvement of a solitary nerve or multiple nerves at a time at multiple sites. Inflammatory neuropathy can also arise due to constant irritation of the nerve by an implant/foreign material [Figure 13]. In such cases, long segment thickening with signal alteration of the nerve is seen which gets relieved after the removal of the foreign material. Another case of long segment thickening of the median and ulnar nerve due to electric shock is shown in [Figure 14]. Few authors advocate the administration of contrast in all cases of inflammatory neuropathies. Inflammation would lead to a disruption of the blood-nerve barrier and hence would show a thin rim enhancement on postgadolinium images.[50],[51]{Figure 13}{Figure 14}

Mass lesions

Mass lesions of peripheral nerves can be divided into lesions that arise either from the nerve or its sheath cells, or as lesions that originate from the surrounding soft tissues, i.e., intraneural or extraneural lesions. Benign neurogenic tumors include schwannomas, neurofibromas, fibrolipomatous hamartomas, lipofibromas, encapsulated neuromas, or macrodystrophia lipomatosa. Macrodystrophia lipomatosa is one of the intraneural pathologies, which is best diagnosed by MRI, which depicts a marked enlargement of the nerve with the presence of increased intraneural fat. Malignant peripheral neurogenic lesions include malignant schwannomas, malignant triton tumors, malignant neurilemomas, neurilemosarcomas, neurofibrosarcomas, neurogenic sarcomas, and neurosarcomas.[52] Mass lesions that may originate from surrounding soft tissues include ganglia and other cysts, enlarged lymph nodes, lipomas, hemangiomas, and other benign or malignant soft-tissue tumors, as well as metastases from malignancies such as melanoma or breast cancer.

The nerve tumors appear as a well defined focal swelling of the nerve with complete loss of its fascicular pattern [Figure 15]. These have altered echogenicity or MR signal intensity and can have areas of necrosis or hemorrhage. No perineural fibrosis is visualized (as in traumatic neuroma).{Figure 15}

Fibrolipomatous hamartoma is one specific condition wherein the MR findings are diagnostic without a need for biopsy. The nerve is grossly enlarged with increased intraneural fat. This condition is most commonly seen in the median nerve.[17]

 Conclusion



Neuropathy is a broad term referring to the clinical presentation of sensory abnormalities (pain, paresthesia, and numbness) or motor weakness in the expected distribution of a particular nerve. With the advent of high-resolution ultrasound and higher field strength magnets having better surface array coils and superior software, these imaging modalities are emerging as the complementary tool of choice for assessment of peripheral neuropathies. In traumatic nerve injuries, the exact lesion localization is the central diagnostic step in the presurgical workup. MRN showed very high sensitivity in detection of the nerve involved with the additional advantage of delineating the exact site of involvement, secondary muscle changes, and in establishing continuity of the nerve which has a bearing on the management and on the prognosis of the nerve injury.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1Andreisek G, Crook DW, Burg D, Marincek B, Weishaupt D. Peripheral neuropathies of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves: MR imaging features. Radiographics 2006;26:1267-87.
2Howe BM, Spinner RJ, Felmlee JP, Frick MA. MR imaging of the nerves of the upper extremity: Elbow to wrist. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2015;23:469-78.
3Chhabra A, Andreisek G, Soldatos T, Wang KC, Flammang AJ, Belzberg AJ, et al. MR neurography: Past, present, and future. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:583-91.
4Cha JG, Han JK, Im SB, Kang SJ. Median nerve T2 assessment in the wrist joints: Preliminary study in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome and healthy volunteers. J Magn Reson Imaging JMRI 2014;40:789-95.
5Chhabra A, Zhao L, Carrino JA, Trueblood E, Koceski S, Shteriev F, et al. MR neurography: Advances. Radiol Res Pract 2013;2013:809568.
6Sallomi D, Janzen DL, Munk PL, Connell DG, Tirman PF. Muscle denervation patterns in upper limb nerve injuries: MR imaging findings and anatomic basis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;171:779-84.
7Chhabra A, Ahlawat S, Belzberg A, Andreseik G. Peripheral nerve injury grading simplified on MR neurography: As referenced to Seddon and Sunderland classifications. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2014;24:217-24.
8Seddon HJ, Medawar PB, Smith H. Rate of regeneration of peripheral nerves in man. J Physiol 1943;102:191-215.
9Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Wessig C, Solymosi L. Sequential MR imaging of denervated muscle: Experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1427-31.
10Schon LC. Nerve entrapment, neuropathy, and nerve dysfunction in athletes. Orthop Clin North Am 1994;25:47-59.
11Spinner RJ, Amadio PC. Compressive neuropathies of the upper extremity. Clin Plast Surg 2003;30:155-73.
12Kim S, Choi JY, Huh YM, Song H-T, Lee S-A, Kim SM, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in entrapment and compressive neuropathy--what, where, and how to see the peripheral nerves on the musculoskeletal magnetic resonance image: Part 2. Upper extremity. Eur Radiol 2007;17:509-22.
13Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, Lobo LD, Yang LJ. Entrapment neuropathies I: Upper limb (carpal tunnel excluded). Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2010;14:473-86.
14Hartz CR, Linscheid RL, Gramse RR, Daube JR. The pronator teres syndrome: Compressive neuropathy of the median nerve. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:885-90.
15Seyffarth H. Primary myoses in the M. pronator teres as cause of lesion of the N. medianus (the pronator syndrome). Acta Psychiatr Neurol Scand Suppl 1951;74:251-4.
16Tubbs RS, Marshall T, Loukas M, Shoja MM, Cohen-Gadol AA. The sublime bridge: Anatomy and implications in median nerve entrapment. J Neurosurg 2010;113:110-2.
17Spinner RJ, Scheithauer BW, Amrami KK, Wenger DE, Hébert-Blouin MN. Adipose lesions of nerve: The need for a modified classification. J Neurosurg 2012;116:418-31.
18Dailiana ZH, Bougioukli S, Varitimidis S, Kontogeorgakos V, Togia E, Vlychou M, et al. Tumors and tumor-like lesions mimicking carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134:139-44.
19Tahiri Y, Xu L, Kanevsky J, Luc M. Lipofibromatous hamartoma of the median nerve: A comprehensive review and systematic approach to evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. J Hand Surg Am 2013;38:2055-67.
20Yalcinkaya M, Akman YE, Bagatur AE. Unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome caused by an occult ganglion in the carpal tunnel: A report of two cases. Case Rep Orthop 2014;2014:589021.
21Yuen A, Thomson S. Carpal tunnel syndrome caused by heterotopic ossification. J Hand Surg EurVol 2011;36:425-6.
22Hariri A, Cohen G, Masmejean EH. Venous malformation involving median nerve causing acute carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2011;36:431-2.
23Hauptfleisch J, English C, Murphy D. Elbow magnetic resonance imaging: Imaging anatomy and evaluation. Top Magn Reson Imaging TMRI 2015;24:93-107.
24Dellon AL. Musculotendinous variations about the medial humeral epicondyle. J Hand Surg Br 1986;11:175-81.
25Sookur PA, Naraghi AM, Bleakney RR, Jalan R, Chan O, White LM. Accessory muscles: Anatomy, symptoms, and radiologic evaluation. Radiographics 2008;28:481-99.
26Keen NN, Chin CT, Engstrom JW, Saloner D, Steinbach LS. Diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow using magnetic resonance neurography. Skeletal Radiol 2012;41:401-7.
27Britz GW, Haynor DR, Kuntz C, Goodkin R, Gitter A, Maravilla K, et al. Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow: Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging, clinical, electrodiagnostic, and intraoperative findings. Neurosurgery 1996;38:458-65.
28Vucic S, Cordato DJ, Yiannikas C, Schwartz RS, Shnier RC. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:590-5.
29Bäumer P, Dombert T, Staub F, Kaestel T, Bartsch AJ, Heiland S, et al. Ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: MR neurography--nerve T2 signal increase and caliber. Radiology 2011;260:199-206.
30Husarik DB, Saupe N, Pfirrmann CW, Jost B, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Elbow nerves: MR findings in 60 asymptomatic subjects--normal anatomy, variants, and pitfalls. Radiology 2009;252:148-56.
31Bordalo-Rodrigues M, Rosenberg ZS. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies at the elbow. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2004;12:247-63.
32Ozdemir O, Calisaneller T, Gerilmez A, Gulsen S, Altinors N. Ulnar nerve entrapment in Guyon's canal due to a lipoma. J Neurosurg Sci 2010;54:125-7.
33Dimitriou C, Natsis K. Accessory abductor digiti minimi muscle causing ulnar nerve entrapment at the Guyon's canal: A case report. Clin Anat 2007;20:974-5.
34Harvie P, Patel N, Ostlere SJ. Ulnar nerve compression at Guyon's canal by an anomalous abductor digiti minimi muscle: The role of ultrasound in clinical diagnosis. Hand Surg 2003;8:271-5.
35Paraskevas GK, Ioannidis O, Economou DS. Anomalous muscle causing ulnar nerve compression at Guyon's canal. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2012;46:288-90.
36Spiess AM, Gursel E. Entrapment of the ulnar nerve at Guyon's canal by an accessory abductor digiti minimi muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117:1060-1.
37Pierre-Jerome C, Moncayo V, Terk MR. The Guyon's canal in perspective: 3-T MRI assessment of the normal anatomy, the anatomical variations and the Guyon's canal syndrome. Surg Radiol Anat SRA 2011;33:897-903.
38Dobson PF, Purushothaman B, Michla Y, England S, Krishnan MK, Tourret L. Delayed ulnar nerve palsy secondary to ulnar artery pseudoaneurysm distal to Guyon's canal following penetrating trauma to the hand. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95:e75-6.
39Kim SS, Kim JH, Kang HI, Lee SJ. Ulnar nerve compression at Guyon's canal by an arteriovenous malformation. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2009;45:57-9.
40Bozkurt MC, Tagil SM, Ozçakar L. Guyon canal. J Neurosurg 2004;100:168.
41Pai V, Harp A, Pai V. Guyon's canal syndrome: A rare case of venous malformation. J Hand Microsurg 2009;1:113-5.
42Kim DH, Han K, Tiel RL, Murovic JA, Kline DG. Surgical outcomes of 654 ulnar nerve lesions. J Neurosurg 2003;98:993-1004.
43Konjengbam M, Elangbam J. Radial nerve in the radial tunnel: Anatomic sites of entrapment neuropathy. Clin Anat 2004;17:21-5.
44Spinner M. The arcade of Frohse and its relationship to posterior interosseous nerve paralysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1968;50:809-12.
45Thomas SJ, Yakin DE, Parry BR, Lubahn JD. The anatomical relationship between the posterior interosseous nerve and the supinator muscle. J Hand Surg 2000;25:936-41.
46Electromyography and Neuromuscular Disorders. 3rd ed. David C. Preston. ISBN: 978145572672. ANZ Elsevier Health Bookshop [Internet]. Available from: http://www.elsevierhealth.com.au/electromyography-and-neuromuscular-disorders-9781455726721.html. [Last cited on 2017 Jan 26].
47Perry JR, Fung A, Poon P, Bayer N. Magnetic resonance imaging of nerve root inflammation in the Guillain-Barré syndrome. Neuroradiology 1994;36:139-40.
48Sander HW, Latov N. Research criteria for defining patients with CIDP. Neurology 2003;60:S8-15.
49Duggins AJ, McLeod JG, Pollard JD, Davies L, Yang F, Thompson EO, et al. Spinal root and plexus hypertrophy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Brain 1999;122:1383-90.
50Tien R, Dillon WP, Jackler RK. Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the facial nerve in 11 patients with Bell's palsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1990;155:573-9.
51Engström M, Thuomas KA, Naeser P, Stålberg E, Jonsson L. Facial nerve enhancement in Bell's palsy demonstrated by different gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1993;119:221-5.
52Murphey MD, Smith WS, Smith SE, Kransdorf MJ, Temple HT. From the archives of the AFIP. Imaging of musculoskeletal neurogenic tumors: Radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999;19:1253-80.