Neurol India Home 

Year : 2010  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 668--669

Coexistent of muscle specific tyrosine kinase and acetylcholine receptor antibodies in a myasthenia gravis patient

Hamid Suhail1, Subbiah Vivekanandhan2, Sumit Singh1, Madhuri Behari1,  
1 Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Neurobiochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Madhuri Behari
Department of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi

How to cite this article:
Suhail H, Vivekanandhan S, Singh S, Behari M. Coexistent of muscle specific tyrosine kinase and acetylcholine receptor antibodies in a myasthenia gravis patient.Neurol India 2010;58:668-669

How to cite this URL:
Suhail H, Vivekanandhan S, Singh S, Behari M. Coexistent of muscle specific tyrosine kinase and acetylcholine receptor antibodies in a myasthenia gravis patient. Neurol India [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Feb 3 ];58:668-669
Available from:

Full Text


Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disorder with approximately 80-85% expressing antibodies against nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChR-). [1] Of the seronegative MG patients, 40 -70% are positive for muscle specific tyrosine kinase antibodies (MuSK-Ab). [2] MuSK-Ab is usually positive in MG patients who are negative for AChR-Ab with progressive course, severe oculo-bulbar involvement, neck drop and respiratory muscle weakness. [3] Presence of both AChR-Ab and MuSK-Ab in the same MG patient is a very rare phenomenon.

A 31year-old female patient was first seen at another hospital in 2002, with 2 years history of intermittent bilateral ptosis, diplopia, proximal muscle weakness, easy fatigability, dysphagia, breathlessness, nasal regurgitation, slurred speech with nasal tone and neck muscle weakness. There was no family history of similar illness. The patient also had hypothyroidism and was on supplemental therapy. Repetitive nerve stimulation test (RNST) revealed decrement response but neostigmine test was negative. AChR and MuSK antibodies were not tested at that stage. Computerized tomographic scan of thorax showed evidence of thymic hyperplasia and thymectomy was done in 2002. The histopathology of thymus confirmed thymic hyperplasia. After thymectomy, the patient showed dramatic improvement in all the clinical symptoms except speech which continued to be slurred and nasal. She remained in remission for 6 years. In 2008, she presented to our neurology clinic facility with recurrence of symptoms, ptosis and diplopia. AChR and MuSK antibodies were tested on two separate occasions by radioimmunoassay method (RIA) using radio-receptor assay kit as per manufacturer's protocol, and she was detected positive for both the antibodies. [4] Her AChR-Ab titer was 2.47 and 1.45 nmol/L and MuSK-Ab titer was 2.23 and 1.75 nmol/L. She was treated with pyridostigmine 60 mg thrice daily with a satisfactory response.

This report presents a very rare patient of MG, who was positive for both AChR and MuSK antibodies. This is the only case in our records of more than 400 MG patients who tested positive for both AChR-Ab and MuSK-Ab. Literature survey revealed one such report who was positive for both AChR-Ab and MuSK-Ab, from UK by Al Saleh and Cariga in 2007. [5] Ohta et al. in 2004 reported MuSK-Abs in AChR-Ab seropositive MG patients, but later they withdrew the report because what they initially believed to be MuSK-Abs turned out to be antibodies to alkaline phosphatase. [6] Saulat et al. reported a case of MG, who was AChR-Ab positive and MuSK-Ab negative before thymectomy, but converted to MuSK-Ab positive and AChR-Ab negative after thymectomy. [7] The authors attributed this to "epitope spreading". Subsequent occurrence of both AChR-Ab and MuSK-Ab with disease relapse is considered to be due to epitope spreading, suggesting the spread of immunologic attack against AChR to include MuSK, with an altered pattern of autoimmune cross reactivity. [8] In experimental models of autoimmune diseases, the phenomenon of epitope spreading is well known. [9] However, in our case, it is difficult to say that this phenomenon of epitope spreading is applicable, since her earlier antibody status is not known. The first time we saw this patient was when she was almost 8 years into illness and after thymectomy with recurrence of symptoms. There is a small probability that relapse of disease may be due to reactivation and proliferation of lymphocytes in germinal hyperplasia after thymectomy. These autoreactive lymphocyte cells might have induced a distinct antibody response and the possibility of cross reacting epitopes happened. Coexistence of MuSK-Ab and AChR-Ab positivity in an MG patient suggests more severe and extensive range of clinical presentation. Additionally, AChR-Ab positive patients with MG should also be considered for MuSK antibody test for better prognosis and treatment.


1Lindstrom J M. Acetylcholine receptors and myasthenia gravis. Muscle Nerve 2000;23:453-77.
2Hoch W, McConville J, Helms S, Newsom-Davis J, Melms A, Vincent A. Auto-antibodies to the receptor tyrosine kinase MuSK in patients with myasthenia gravis without acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Nat Med 2001;7:365-8.
3Evoli A, Tonali PA, Padua L, Monaco ML, Scuderi F, Batocchi AP, et al. Clinical correlates with anti-MuSK antibodies in generalized seronegative myasthenia gravis. Brain 2003;126:2304-11.
4Lefvert AK, Bergstrom K, Matell G, Osterman PO, Pirskanen R. Determination of acetylcholine receptor antibody in myasthenia gravis: clinical usefulness and pathogenetic implications. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1978;41:394-403.
5Al Saleh A, Cariga P. Myasthenia gravis with AChR and MuSK antibodies positivity: Case report. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:e165.
6Ohta K, Shigemoto K, Kubo S, Maruyama N, Abe Y, Ueda N, et al. MuSK Ab described in seropositive MG sera found to be Ab to alkaline phosphatase. Neurology 2005;65:1988.
7Saulat B, Maertens P, Hamilton WJ, Bassam BA. Anti-MuSk antibody after thymectomy in a previously seropositive myasthenic child. Neurology 2007;69:803-4.
8Vincent A, Willcox N, Hill M, Curnow J, MacLennan C, Beeson D. Determinant spreading and immune responses to acetylcholine receptors un myasthenia gravis. Immunol Rev 1998;164:157-68.
9Vanderlugt CL, Miller SD. Epitope spreading in immune mediated disease: implications for immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol 2002;2:85-95.