Atormac
briv
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 25066  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (1,011 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 » Material and Methods
 » Discussion
 » Conclusions
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed356    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded7    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
BRIEF REPORT
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1763-1766

Atlantoaxial and Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instability in Two Cases with Neurofibromatosis-Type 1


1 Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel; Consultant Neurosurgeon, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre, Bandra (E), Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Neurosurgery, K.E.M. Hospital and Seth G.S. Medical College, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission04-May-2020
Date of Decision14-May-2020
Date of Acceptance13-Jul-2020
Date of Web Publication23-Dec-2021

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Atul Goel
Department of Neurosurgery, Lilavati Hospital and Research Center, Bandra, Mumbai - 400050, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.333503

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 


This is a report of two patients who were diagnosed to have NF-1. The patients had severe dystrophic soft tissue and bone changes leading to craniovertebral junction and subaxial cervical spinal instability and deformity. Both the patients underwent atlantoaxial and subaxial cervical spinal stabilization. No bone, soft tissue or tumor resection was done for decompression. Both patients had gratifying clinical recovery. Follow-up in both the patients is more than 12 months.


Keywords: Atlantoaxial instability, facetal fixation, neurofibromatosis
Key Messages: Neurofibromatosis-Type 1 can be associated with multiple dystrophic soft tissue alteration and primary or secondary bone changes. Such changes leading to craniovertebral and cervical spinal instability are relatively rare. The authors treated two such cases with multisegmental fixation.


How to cite this article:
Goel A, Dandpat S, Shah A, Bhambere S, Darji H. Atlantoaxial and Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instability in Two Cases with Neurofibromatosis-Type 1. Neurol India 2021;69:1763-6

How to cite this URL:
Goel A, Dandpat S, Shah A, Bhambere S, Darji H. Atlantoaxial and Subaxial Cervical Spinal Instability in Two Cases with Neurofibromatosis-Type 1. Neurol India [serial online] 2021 [cited 2022 Jan 20];69:1763-6. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2021/69/6/1763/333503




Neurofibromatosis (NF) is a multisystem autosomal dominant disorder and primarily affects cell growth of neural tissue. NF Type 1 is peripheral NF, and NF Type 2 is central NF. The dysplasia affects neuroectoderm and neuromesoderm, and consequently it affects skin, soft tissues, and bones apart from involving central nervous system. Spinal deformities have been identified with both dystrophic and nondystrophic variants of NF-1.[1],[2],[3],[4] We present our experience with two cases with NF Type 1 having dystrophic bone and soft tissue changes that were focused to the craniovertebral junction and cervical spine and led to severe craniovertebral junction and cervical spinal instability and deformity. Both patients were treated by atlantoaxial fixation and additionally underwent multilevel subaxial cervical spinal facetal fixation. No bone and soft tissue decompression or tumor resection was done. Our literature search did not locate reports of similar cases and with such form of surgical treatment.


 » Material and Methods Top


Two patients having NF1 were surgically treated in the departments of the authors during the period December 2017–January 2019. These patients are retrospectively analyzed. Clinical profile and presenting clinical symptoms are summarized in [Table 1]. Both the patients had multiple neurofibromas and café-au-lait spots all over the body. Both patients were monitored by validated parameters that included JOA and VAS indices, both before and after surgery. Imaging included dynamic (with head in flexed, neutral and extended positions) plain radiography and CT scan and MRI. Status of the vertebral artery was evaluated on the basis of MRI and CT scan images. Dedicated angiography was not done. [Figure 1] and [Figure 2] show representative images.
Figure 1: Images of a 23-year-old female patient. (a) Contrast-enhanced MRI shows dysplastic enhancing tissue in the craniovertebral junction. Atlantoaxial instability can be seen. (b) CT scan shows atlantoaxial disability. (c) CT scan cut traversing through the facets showing dislocation of facet of atlas anterior to facet of axis. The subaxial facets are of normal architecture. (d) Postoperative image showing significant but incomplete reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation. (e) Postoperative CT scan sagittal cut showing the instrumentation. (f) CT scan images showing the metal implant in the atlantoaxial and subaxial facets

Click here to view
Figure 2: Images of a 38-year-old male patient. (a) Contrast-enhanced MRI showing extensive dysplastic tissue in the region of cervical spine and craniovertebral junction. Marked bone destruction and atlantoaxial and subaxial cervical spinal instability are seen that has resulted in cervical spinal kyphotic deformity. (b) CT scan with the head in flexion showing the abnormal bone architecture and alignment of the entire cervical spine. Atlantoaxial dislocation can be observed. (c) CT scan with the head in extended position showing reduction in atlantoaxial dislocation. (d) CT scan cut through the facets showing extensive bone destruction. (e) Postoperative CT scan showing the spinal alignment. (f) Postoperative CT scan showing the metal implants in the craniovertebral junction and cervical spine

Click here to view
Table 1: Clinical details of the patients

Click here to view


Surgical procedure

The surgical position was as described by us earlier for atlantoaxial fixation. The patient was placed prone under traction with the head end of the table elevated by 30 degree. Traction helped to maintain optimum neck position during surgery, kept the head in a “floating” position that avoided pressure on the face and eyes and reduced venous congestion in the operating field. Traction assisted in reduction in the atlantoaxial instability and in the spinal deformity. Atlantoaxial fixation was done with the technique described by us earlier and is summarized here.[5],[6] Atlantoaxial joint was widely opened. Bone graft was stuffed into the articular cavity. Plate and screw atlantoaxial fixation was then done. Subaxial fixation was done by Camille's technique of transarticular screw insertion.[7] The parameters used to insert the screws were standard but were modified after assessing the real-time anatomical situation in the deformed and destructed spinal situation. After the metal instrumentation, the spinous processes were sectioned at their base and all the soft tissue interspinous and interlaminar ligaments were sharply cut. Posterior surfaces of laminae and arch of atlas were then decorticated to make them suitable host for bone graft. Cut spinous processes were shredded for bone graft. Additionally, bone graft was harvested from the iliac crest. Postoperatively, the patient was instructed to avoid all neck movements and was placed in firm cervical four-post collar for a period of 3 months. After confirming satisfactory implant positioning and evidences of bone fusion across the facets, the patients were gradually allowed normal life activities.

Follow-up after the surgical procedure was 14 and 26 months. Clinical assessment at the time of last follow-up is summarized in [Table 1]. Essentially, both the patients showed clinical recovery that was observed in the immediate postoperative period and progressed. Dynamic CT scan confirmed significant but incomplete reduction of atlantoaxial dislocation, and basilar invagination and neck deformity-related gibbus. Adequate fusion of the treated spinal segments could be observed [Figure 1]e and [Figure 2]e. There was no delayed neurological worsening. Imaging did not show any significant increase in the abnormal spinal and extraspinal soft tissue mass. Restriction of neck movements that was present even before surgery persisted but both the patients were completely relieved of the nagging pain in the nape of neck.


 » Discussion Top


Although the exact incidence of spinal deformities in cases with NF-1 is difficult to speculate, it has been reported to be between 2 and 70%.[1],[2],[3],[4] Thoracic spine is more frequently involved. Clinical and radiological features and surgical treatment of nondystrophic type is essentially similar to that generally described and conducted for idiopathic spinal deformities. The spinal deformities in NF-1 are more often related to dystrophic changes in the bones, ligaments, and soft tissues. Dystrophic spinal bone alterations include vertebral body scalloping and wedging, segmental subluxation, foraminal enlargement, and defective pedicles.[1],[2],[3],[4] Soft tissue abnormalities include paraspinal and intraspinal soft tissue tumor-like formations, dural ectasia, dumbbell neurofibromas extending into intervertebral foramina and causing foraminal enlargement. Spinal deformities can be associated with multiple neurofibromas or with plexiform NF. The exact pathogenetic issue that results in such gross structural deformity is difficult to speculate. Erosion or infiltration of bone by localized neurofibromas, primary mesodermal dysplasia, osteomalacia, and related endocrine disturbances are among the presumed causes of spinal deformity. Although dysplasia of tissues does not indicate the presence of “malignant” change, it is recognized as a premalignant condition, and in the long run, the tissues are more prone to conversion into malignancy.

In both of our patients, there was marked bone destruction, spinal deformity, and evidences of instability. There was presence of soft tissue enhancing mass around the odontoid process and in the paravertebral spaces. This tissue was probably related to combination of presence of plexiform neurofibromas and to mesodermal dysplasia. The bone deformation and destruction appeared to be related both to compressive effects of the tumor and to the mesodermal dysplasia involving the bone and adjacent soft tissues. The course or development and progression of the spinal deformity are difficult to assess due to the rarity of such cases. However, limited information available on the issue suggests that the spinal deformity is present for a significant period of time and is progressive in nature.[1],[2],[3],[4],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] Both decompression by removal of the tumor and compressive bone and stabilization of the spine have been accepted mode of surgical treatment.[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14] As complete or even “radical” resection of the tumor is difficult or impossible, the optimum extent of tumor resection that is necessary remains controversial. However, it appears that resection of the part of the tumor that directly compresses and deforms the cord is mandatory.

Analysis on the basis of our study in craniovertebral junction and spinal disorders suggest that in slow progressive disorders or deformities neurological symptoms are related to subtle instability-related microtrauma rather than radiologically visible spinal deformity or neural tissue deformation. Accordingly, the aim of our surgical treatment was stabilization of the involved spinal segments rather than decompression by removal of bones and soft tissues. In both of our cases, there was atlantoaxial instability and subaxial cervical spinal instability. Surgery involved atlantoaxial and multisegmental subaxial spinal facetal fixation. Atlantoaxial fixation was done using the technique described by us earlier in 1994,[5],[6] and subaxial spinal fixation was done by transarticular facetal fixation with the technique described by Camille in 1972.[7] As discussed in our earlier publication, the levels of spinal fixation that was necessary was gauzed by the extent of cervical deformity. The entire “C” of the kyphotic segment was considered to be unstable and was included in the fixation construct. It was observed that the facets were relatively intact and less involved by the destruction unlike the other components of the vertebrae. The pedicles seemed to be most affected component of the vertebra. The facetal fixation could be done under direct vision, avoiding the need for neuronavigation or fluoroscopy during surgery. Due to limited experience of the authors, exact utility of both O-arm and navigation in such complex clinical situation cannot be adequately confirmed. The facets being the strongest part of the vertebra provided a strong ground for purchase of screws. The large size of the facets permitted alteration of site of screw insertion and trajectory as per the status of the facet. Considering the degree of spinal deformity and the status of pedicles, it appeared that other techniques that involve deployment of screws in the pedicles or use of multisegmental rods were less than optimal in the situation. Also, due to the nature of bone involvement, anterior cervical surgery that involved multisegmental plate fixation was considered to be a more difficult and less effective option. Despite this consideration, it does appear that a circumferential fixation-arthrodesis could have been an effective mode of surgical treatment in this complex clinical situation.

Our earlier report on the subject of cervical kyphosis indicates the validity of multilevel spinal fixation without any form of bone or soft tissue decompression.[15],[16] This strategy is in contrast with the other reports on the subject wherein anterior cervical multilevel corpectomies and posterior laminectomy or laminoplasty were recommended for decompression of the neural structures.[1],[2],[3],[4],[8],[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14]


 » Conclusions Top


NF-1 can be associated with spinal instability-related deformities. Spinal stabilization is the treatment.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Taleb FS, Guha A, Arnold PM, Fehlings MG, Massicotte EM. Surgical management of cervical spine manifestations of neurofibromatosis Type 1: Long-term clinical and radiological follow-up in 22 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:356-66.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Ma J, Wu Z, Yang X, Xiao J. Surgical treatment of severe cervical dystrophic kyphosis due to neurofibromatosis Type 1: A review of 8 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;14:93-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tsirikos AI, Saifuddin A, Noordeen MH. Spinal deformity in neurofibromatosis type-1: Diagnosis and treatment. Eur Spine J 2005;14:427-39.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Funasaki H, Winter RB, Lonstein JB, Denis F. Pathophysiology of spinal deformities in neurofibromatosis. An analysis of seventy-one patients who had curves associated with dystrophic changes. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1994;76:692-700.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Goel A, Laheri V. Plate and screw fixation for atlanto-axial subluxation. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1994;129:47-53.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Goel A, Desai K, Muzumdar D. Atlantoaxial fixation using plate and screw method: A report of 160 treated patients. Neurosurgery 2002;51:1351-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Roy-Camille R, Saillant G. Surgery of the cervical spine. 2. Dislocation. Fracture of the articular processes. Nouv Presse Med 1972;1:2484-5.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Isu T, Miyasaka K, Abe H, Ito T, Iwasaki Y, Tsuru M, et al. Atlantoaxial dislocation associated with neurofibromatosis. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 1983;58:451-3.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Nathan ST, Mangano FT, Crawford AH. Spondyloptosis of the cervical spine in a patient with neurofibromatosis type 1: A case report and review of the literature. JBJS Case Connect 2013;3:e5.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Veras LM, Castellanos J, Ramírez G, Valer A, Casamitjana J, González F. Atlanto axial instability due to neurofibromatosis: Case report. Acta Orthop Belg 2000;66:392-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Maheshwari S, Kale HA, Desai SB, Kohli A. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in an unusual case of atlanto axial dislocation and vertebral artery-vein fistulas in a patient of neurofibromatosis-1. Australas Radiol 2002;46:316-8.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Craig JB, Govender S. Neurofibromatosis of the cervical spine. A report of eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1992;74:575-8.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Hasegawa H, Bitoh S, Katoh A, Tamura K. Bilateral vertebral arteriovenous fistulas and atlantoaxial dislocation associated with neurofibromatosis – Case report. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 1989;29:55-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Kinoshita H, Miyakoshi N, Kobayashi T, Abe T, Kikuchi K, Shimada Y. A case report of revision occipital-cervical fusion after atlanto-axial instrumentation failure for neurofibromatosis type I. BMC Surg 2019;19:44.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Goel A, Kaswa A, Shah A. Role of atlantoaxial and subaxial spinal instability in pathogenesis of spinal “degeneration”-related cervical kyphosis. World Neurosurg 2017;101:702-9.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Goel A, Kaswa A, Shah A, Dhar A. Multilevel spinal segmental fixation for kyphotic cervical spinal deformity in pediatric age group-report of management in 2 cases. World Neurosurg 2017;106:661-5.  Back to cited text no. 16
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow