Atormac
briv
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 9875  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed851    
    Printed12    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded25    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 

 REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2021  |  Volume : 69  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1539--1546

Multiple Sclerosis-Minimizing Errors in Radiological Diagnosis


1 Dr. Gulati Imaging at National Heart Institute, New Delhi, India
2 Nalanda Medical College, Patna, Bihar, India
3 Dr. Gulati Imaging Institute, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Parveen Gulati
Dr. Gulati Imaging Institute, J-16, Hauz Khas Enclave, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.333497

Rights and Permissions

Background: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic demyelinating disorder with a myriad of imaging and clinical features that overlap with number of other neurological conditions. Incorrect diagnosis poses a significant risk to patients, it may lead to delays in management, increased morbidity, and also adds to the financial cost. Objective: The aim of this study was to highlight strategies for the efficient differentiation of multiple sclerosis from other diseases which may masquerade as MS clinico-radiologically. Material and Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted through online databases including PubMed and Medline. Relevant publications on radiological aspects of multiple sclerosis, white matter diseases and mimickers of Multiple sclerosis were included in the analysis. Results: Common mimickers of MS include small vessel disease, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, anti-MOG encephalomyelitis, vasculitis, and CADASIL. Contrast-enhanced MRI study performed using MS protocol on high strength MRI system evaluated following a structured protocol along with clinical correlation is effective in differentiating MS from its mimickers. Conclusions: Contrast-enhanced MRI performed on a high strength scanner using MS protocol with structured protocol for evaluation along, with a better collaboration between radiologists and clinicians may help in minimizing errors in diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow