Atormac
brintellex
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 4409  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (693 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  References
 »  Article Figures
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed594    
    Printed6    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
NI FEATURE: CENTS (CONCEPTS, ERGONOMICS, NUANCES, THERBLIGS, SHORTCOMINGS)
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1414-1417

Grid-Based Preconception Counseling Can Facilitate Shared Decision Making for Women with Epilepsy


Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy, Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India

Date of Web Publication19-Dec-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sanjeev V Thomas
Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy, Department of Neurology, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.304110

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Women with epilepsy (WWE) and their care providers are equally concerned about the risk of seizures and adverse effects of using antiepileptic drugs (AED) during pregnancy to the mother and the baby. The risk of death or other complications during the pregnancy period is high when WWE continue to have seizures. Antenatal exposure to valproate and several other AEDs as monotherapy and polytherapy is associated with a higher risk of Major Congenital Malformations (MCM). The risk of MCM is dose dependent for valproate and several other AEDs. Children who were exposed to AEDs in the antenatal period demonstrate impaired intelligence and language functions when examined in early childhood, and this effect endures into the second decade of life also. There is considerable difficulty in communicating the complexities of the benefits and risks of using AEDs during the preconception period and pregnancy to the women and their relatives. In this technical note, we are presenting the grid-based preconception counseling of the risk and benefits of different treatment options to facilitate shared decision making. The clinician elicits the preferences and concerns of WWE in the first column of the grid. The potential outcomes of different treatment options concerning these preferences and concerns are presented in the remaining columns of the grid so that a shared decision can be reached. This option grid provides an opportunity to the WWE to review the options holistically and make appropriate decisions.


Keywords: Informed consent, option grid, preconception counseling malformation risk, shared decision making, women with epilepsy
Key Messages: Shared decision making (SDM) involving both the treating physician, the patient and the caregivers is a great way of deciding the best possible management course. SDM using grid based model may be extremely useful for managing complex medical diseases, especially Epilepsy care, elective surgeries, mental disorders and cardiovascular diseases.


How to cite this article:
Thomas SV. Grid-Based Preconception Counseling Can Facilitate Shared Decision Making for Women with Epilepsy. Neurol India 2020;68:1414-7

How to cite this URL:
Thomas SV. Grid-Based Preconception Counseling Can Facilitate Shared Decision Making for Women with Epilepsy. Neurol India [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Jan 22];68:1414-7. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2020/68/6/1414/304110




Epilepsy is one of the most common serious neurological disorders anywhere in the world. Around 50 million people have epilepsy, and half of them are women. About 12–13 million women with epilepsy (WWE) are in the reproductive age group (15–50 years). Most women with active epilepsy require continued use of antiepileptic drugs (AED) during pregnancy to remain seizure free. A large meta-analysis had shown that adverse outcomes of pregnancy such as spontaneous miscarriage, antepartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, hypertensive disorders cesarean section, and preterm birth are increased in WWE.[1] The risk of mortality in pregnancy is increased by tenfold WWE[2] and SUDEP accounted for most of the mortality during pregnancy[3] These observations point towards the need to control seizures by appropriate treatment during pregnancy in WWE. On the other hand, it is widely recognized that the use of AEDs may increase the risk of major congenital malformations in the fetus[4],[5],[6] or lead to neurocognitive developmental delay.[7],[8]

Most WWE who are planning pregnancy have a considerable dilemma about using AEDs.[9] They are worried about the potential risk that the seizures may worsen if medications are reduced or stopped even as they are anxious that the use of AEDs during pregnancy may lead to birth defects in their babies. In many busy practices in low- and middle-income countries, detailed counseling on the nuances of medical management is not delivered properly. The availability of medicines, access to health care, and expertise of the care providers to manage epilepsy and pregnancy vary considerably between low- and middle-income countries and higher-income countries. Many a time, the medical professionals are unable to communicate the risk from different sources (AED usage, seizures during pregnancy, other factors) directly and tangibly. Many of the professional guidelines on managing epilepsy and pregnancy are prepared from the care provider's perspective and are not updated regularly. They may not be of much assistance to the patients or their families to understand the complexity.[10] Several professional organizations and statutory bodies have released guidelines for selecting the appropriate treatment for WWE who are planning a pregnancy.[11],[12] Most women find it difficult to assimilate the evidence base in a balanced manner and make an intelligent decision regarding their treatment. In recent years, several regulatory authorities have issued severe restrictions or ban on the use of valproate in women.[13]

In this special context, the traditional approach of obtaining informed consent for a treatment protocol has certain limitations as its emphasis is in documenting the subject's approval of a given treatment. It does not capture the values, priorities, and concerns of the subject vis a vis. the available literature on the subject. The process of informed consent provides a set of standard information on the treatment options and potential outcomes (favorable and unfavorable) to the subjects before they express their consent to a specific treatment option.

Shared decision making (SDM) is preferable in such situations where there are multiple treatment options and potential outcomes. It goes one step further in that the care provider assists the patient to understand the evidence base. SDM is becoming popular in the care of epilepsy,[14] cardiovascular disorders,[15] elective surgery,[16] mental disorders,[17] and cancer.[18],[19]

The first step in the process is the elicitation of the patient's values, concerns, goals, preferences, and objections to any line of management. The next step would be to provide evidence-based information on the specific issues and concerns in a balanced way so that the patients can understand options and possible consequences. The last step is to reach a mutual agreement on the preferred line of management.

Several tools and instruments have been developed to facilitate this process. These are broadly termed decision aids. The decision aids can be visual analog scales, graphs, computer-assisted tools, or option grids. A meta-analysis of 23 studies had shown that SDM interventions could have a variable effect on risk estimation and involvement in clinical decision making.[20]

The complexities of adverse effects of different AED therapies during pregnancy on the mother and fetus, the impact of seizures during pregnancy on the health of the fetus, mother and its social repercussions constitute an ideal setting to adopt SDM for epilepsy care during pregnancy.[21]

The Kerala Registry of epilepsy and pregnancy had been offering preconception care for WWE on a routine basis. Since 1998, 30% of all registrations in this registry were in the preconception stage. A recent analysis of the data from this registry had shown that women who had preconception counseling and care had significantly higher compliance with AED usage, folic acid prophylaxis, and better seizure control during pregnancy.[22] The registry has the approval of the Institutional Ethics committee and informed consent is obtained from all registrants. We had customized a grid-based presentation of treatment options and outcome analysis for counseling patients during preconception clinical encounter. This decision aid is a grid that the care provider generates by actively interacting with the subjects on a one to one face-to-face meeting. The preferences, values, priorities, and concerns of the woman are recorded in the first column of the grid. The care provider would populate the remaining cells in the grid with the potential outcomes under different treatment options. The quantitative details of the outcomes are based on the data from the KREP and other published sets of evidence and information.

The clinician sits with the patient and partner with a pen and paper and draws a grid with several rows and columns. We encourage the patients to state their requirements say; I should not have any seizures, I should not have trouble in conceiving, I should not have any seizures during pregnancy, My baby should not have any birth defects, My baby should not have any neurocognitive defects when he or she grows up. I should not have any complications of pregnancy. I should be able to breastfeed my baby. My medical expenditure should not go up. We enter these requirements cited by the patients in the first column. Afterwards, the clinician sets down the various management options, say not using any AEDs, continuing on current treatment, continuing low dose of the same medicine, switching over to drug A, or B or adding another drug to present treatment. The clinician populates the cells under each column, one at a time, with possible outcomes based on current evidence [see [Table 1] and [Table 2]. The client has the opportunity to see how the various outcomes get modified under different scenarios. A given AED usage may improve seizure control but may carry a higher risk of malformation, while another therapy with lesser malformation risk may predispose to dose escalation during pregnancy or possible breakthrough seizures. The client can weigh the impact of a breakthrough seizure in her social and family life versus less teratogenic effects. This grid is only an illustration and the contents of the grid would vary according to the individual's clinical profile. We often use a visual aid to explain the proportions and percentages [see [Figure 1]]. We use a grid of 100 cells to depict the pregnancy outcome of 100 WWE. The malformation risk when the mother takes no AED is shown as the baseline. The increase in this risk with different AED usage is shown for sets of 100 WWE. A holistic view of the situation is provided by including the green cells to indicate that over 90% of the pregnancies result in no malformations.
Figure 1: Grid-based visual aid to demonstrate the proportions and percentage of risk of congenital malformations associated with different treatment options. Panel A 100 women who do not use AEDs carrying 3% risk, B Women using an AED (e.g., Carbamazepine) with 5% risk and C women on valproate monotherapy with 8% risk. The change in risk with different scenario is shown in different colors, and the green cells (more than 90%) in the set with no malformations give a wholistic picture

Click here to view
Table 1: An illustration of the grid-based presentation of options and outcomes 30-year-old housewife (fictitious case), married for past 10 years, JME on VPA 1000 mg per day. Last seizure 3 years back. Intends to conceive shortly

Click here to view
Table 2: An illustration of the grid-based presentation of options and outcomes: A 28-year-old manager of an office (fictitious case), with Rt mesial temporal lobe epilepsy on Levetiracetam 2500 mg per day and clobazam 10 mg per day. Allergic to carbamazepine. Last seizure 6 months back. Intends to conceive shortly

Click here to view


This grid-based presentation of the possible outcomes with different treatment options provides the patient and partner with the opportunity to compare the risk-benefit dynamics in an efficient and real-life-like situation and make appropriate decisions. We have customized the grid to the specific needs of individuals. Nevertheless, some recurrent themes emerge over time. This type of counseling takes about 10–15 min for the discussion and SDM.

In our registry, about 30% of the registrations are carried out in the preconception stage, that offered much opportunity to discuss the diverse issues related to pregnancy and the strategies to make pregnancy safer for the mother and baby alike. One of the advantages of this grid-based presentation of the data is that the clients can weigh the merits and demerits of the different treatment options. They can visualize themselves under different scenarios and compare the differences in the outcome. Earlier, when these data are presented to women in verbal form many women were perplexed and confused and would request the doctor to take an appropriate decision. The presentation of the same data in this grid format along with the visual scale improved the situation considerably and most women were able to express their choice or preferences in the treatment options. The data from this registry had shown that who had preconception care had better compliance with treatment and improved seizure outcome during pregnancy. We have put up the protocol of our grid-based preconception counseling for a wider consideration of the professionals and further refinement.

Financial support and sponsorship

Indian Council of Medical Research.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
 » References Top

1.
Viale L, Allotey J, Cheong-See F, Arroyo-Manzano D, Mccorry D, Bagary M, et al. EBM CONNECT Collaboration. Epilepsy in pregnancy and reproductive outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 2015;386:1845-52.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Adab N, Kini U, Vinten J, Ayres J, Baker G, Clayton-Smith J, et al. The longer-term outcome of children born to mothers with epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2004;75:1575-83.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Edey S, Moran N, Nashef L. SUDEP and epilepsy-related mortality in pregnancy. Epilepsia 2014;55:e72-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Thomas SV, Jose M, Divakaran S, Sankara Sarma P. Malformation risk of antiepileptic drug exposure during pregnancy in women with epilepsy: Results from a pregnancy registry in South India. Epilepsia 2017;58:274-81.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Tomson T, Battino D, Bonizzoni E, Craig J, Lindhout D, Perucca E, et al. EURAP Study Group. Comparative risk of major congenital malformations with eight different antiepileptic drugs: A prospective cohort study of the EURAP registry. Lancet Neurol 2018;17:530-8.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Keni RR, Jose M, Sarma PS, Thomas SV; Kerala Registry of Epilepsy and Pregnancy Study Group. Teratogenicity of antiepileptic dual therapy: Dose-dependent, drug-specific, or both? Neurology 2018;90:e790-6.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Gopinath N, Muneer AK, Unnikrishnan S, Varma RP, Thomas SV. Children (10-12 years age) of women with epilepsy have lower intelligence, attention and memory: Observations from a prospective cohort case-control study. Epilepsy Res 2015;117:58-62.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Baker GA, Bromley RL, Briggs M, Cheyne CP, Cohen MJ, García-Fiñana M, et al. Liverpool and Manchester Neurodevelopment Group. IQ at 6 years after in utero exposure to antiepileptic drugs: A controlled cohort study. Neurology 2015;84:382-90.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Macfarlane A, Greenhalgh T. Sodium valproate in pregnancy: What are the risks and should we use a shared decision-making approach?. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2018;18:200.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vandvik PO, Brandt L, Alonso-Coello P, Treweek S, Akl EA, Kristiansen A, et al. Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: A new era is imminent. Chest 2013;144:381-9.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Epilepsy in Pregnancy. Green Top Guidelines. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2016. p. 68.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence: Bipolar disorder: Assessment and management. In., vol. Clinical guideline CG185; 2014.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Iacobucci G. MHRA bans valproate prescribing for women, not in pregnancy prevention programme. BMJ 2018;361:1823.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Pickrell WO, Elwyn G, Smith PE. Shared decision-making in epilepsy management. Epilepsy Behav 2015;47:78-82.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Backman WD, Levine SA, Wenger NK, Harold JG. Shared decision-making for older adults with cardiovascular disease. lin Cardiol 2020;43:196-204.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Pham C, Lizarondo L, Karnon J, Aromataris E, Munn Z, Gibb C, et al. Strategies for implementing shared decision making in elective surgery by health care practitioners: A systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2020;26:582-601.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Huang C, Plummer V, Lam L, Cross W. Perceptions of shared decision making in severe mental illness: An integrative review. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2020;27:103-127.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Martínez-González NA, Plate A, Markun S, Senn O, Rosemann T, Neuner-Jehle S. Shared decision making for men facing prostate cancer treatment: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Patient Prefer Adherence 2019;13:1153-74.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Spronk I, Meijers MC, Heins MJ, Francke AL, Elwyn G, van Lindert A, et al. Availability and effectiveness of decision aids for supporting shared decision making in patients with advanced colorectal and lung cancer: Results from a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019;28:e13079.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Mathijssen EGE, van den Bemt BJF, van den Hoogen FHJ, Popa CD, Vriezekolk JE. Interventions to support shared decision making for medication therapy in long term conditions: A systematic review. Patient Educ Couns 2020;103:254-65.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Laganà AS, Triolo O, D'Amico V, Cartella SM, Sofo V, Salmeri FM, et al. Management of women with epilepsy: From preconception to post-partum. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2016;293:493-503.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Baishya J, Jose M, Reshma A S, Sarma PS, Thomas SV. Do women with epilepsy benefit from epilepsy specific pre-conception care?. Epilepsy Res 2020;160:106260. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres. 2019.106260  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow