Atormac
brintellex
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 449  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Article in PDF (1,181 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
   References
   Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed265    
    Printed5    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded32    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 68  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 947-949

Postgraduate Training in Neurosurgery—A UK Perspective


Department of Neurosurgery, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Langlands Dr, Glasgow G51 4LB, United Kingdom

Date of Web Publication26-Aug-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Parameswaran Bhattathiri
Consultant Neurosurgeon, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Campus, Langlands Dr, Glasgow G51 4LB
United Kingdom
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.293473

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Hegde A, Bhattathiri P. Postgraduate Training in Neurosurgery—A UK Perspective. Neurol India 2020;68:947-9

How to cite this URL:
Hegde A, Bhattathiri P. Postgraduate Training in Neurosurgery—A UK Perspective. Neurol India [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Oct 24];68:947-9. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2020/68/4/947/293473




We read with great interest Garg et al.'s article on neurosurgery training in India.[1] We congratulate them on their attempt to gather trainee feedback on a national level. Clinical governance and standardization require centers to undertake such training audits and questionnaires on a regular basis in Western countries. Garg's article is possibly the first of its kind in providing feedback on neurosurgical training in India. Modern neurosurgery education in India is relatively new compared to the Western world. It has progressed rapidly and is well-established with a structured pattern.[2]

The authors have analyzed teaching pattern, subspecialty exposure, examination pattern, surgical training, and medium of learning in their well-written article. They have highlighted several positive points in neurosurgical training. Preoperative discussions were the most relevant form of teaching (89%), while journal presentations were the least preferred among residents. The current pattern of Exit exams (62–88%) and teaching (53–89%) have good relevance and acceptance among training graduates. The operative exam, although quite popular, is practiced in very few centers across the country.[2],[3] As apt for the 21st-century trainees prefer electronic media (e-books and e-journals) as their source of reference and learning (60–81%).

Few of the less accepted aspects of training are the fields of image interpretation, operative teaching, hands-on opportunity of residents, and speciality exposure. Only 37% of trainees felt that training on image interpretation was good/excellent. Subspecialty exposure was considered inadequate by most respondents, but for exposure to radiosurgery. Considering the length of training in India, it would be challenging to get vast exposure to several specialities in a short period of training. The volume of exposure would also depend upon the training institute, whether government or private.

As a surgical resident, one of the most important aspects of training is the surgical skills they develop through the period. The authors from their study quote that 55% of the respondents felt that operative training was Good or Excellent, while only 42% felt that were provided with adequate hands-on exposure to neurosurgical cases. If this is the scenario in few of the country's best government medical schools, the residency programs by the National Board of Examinations in the private sector have already acknowledged limitations in resident opportunities for actual “cutting and stitching” although there is plenty of clinical material and modern equipment.[4] This is a serious concern with regard to the competence of graduating residents safely performing independent procedures.

The corresponding author completed his neurosurgical training in one of the premier institutes of India and relocated to the UK for further training and certification as a consultant neurosurgeon. Having seen the best of both systems, we recommend some simple, non-bureaucratic measures that can be implemented in India. These can have significant impacts on the quality of surgical training.

The United Kingdom has a very comprehensive system of assessing surgical competency over their training period. Their accreditation board proposes the candidate should have completed 1200 cases (including 70 pediatric) over an 8-year duration, with 2/3rd performed independently or under the supervision of a trainer. It also defines 50 index cases across specialties that have to be performed as a primary surgeon.[5]

Candidates who do not fulfill this cannot appear for the examination. Following successful completion of the examination, one has to register onto the specialist register which satisfies criteria in clinical experience, operative experience and competence, research, quality improvement, medical education and training, management, leadership, and participation in conferences.[6] This sets high standards in surgical competency and expertise, improving patient safety and outcome.

In India, the governing body for neurosurgical education does have a very comprehensive curriculum for postgraduate training. It recommends a minimum of 400 cases during the training program spanning either three years or six years, with at least 10% (40 cases) performed independently. It recommends a minimum of 10 craniotomies to complete neurosurgical training.[7] Further, there is no reference to the concept of index cases during training. It is probably time to look into these numbers with more detail, in a country with a population of a billion people. A finishing surgical resident should be “competent” at a minimum and preferably “proficient” in essential procedures.[8]

A surgical logbook that is maintained and validated by trainers will enable us to ensure a higher quality of training in surgical specialities, especially neurosurgery. Monitoring the type of case is considered one way to ensure a general level of experience and growing competence before beginning post-residency practice. It provides an objective performance of residents and medical schools with evidence that the level of operative participation is significant in technical skills development.[9] The e-logbook (www.elogbook.org) is an initiative by the Royal Colleges in the United Kingdom with support and guidance from national surgical societies like the Society of British Neurological Surgeons to record and monitor the training of its residents and build a surgical portfolio helping them through appraisals, revalidations, and recertifications. It is a free resource that can be used by practicing surgeons across the globe. Each procedure is tagged with the level of involvement of the trainee and also breaks down each step of the surgery to record participation in operative stages [Figure 1]. A comprehensive report at the end of residency can help evaluate one's strengths and weaknesses and guide further improvement [Figure 2].
Figure 1: Data entry form with the details of procedure and level of involvement in each step of the procedure

Click here to view
Figure 2: Comprehensive report of procedures. A = assisted, S-TS = supervised-trainer scrubbed, S-TU = supervised-trainer unscrubbed but in theater, P = performed, T = training a trainee, S-S = supervised (scrubbed), S-U = supervised (in theater), S-H = supervised (in hospital), U = under my care, O = observed, PPC = performed with consultant colleague, PPT = performed in part by trainee, PAT = performed: assisted by trainee

Click here to view


Implementation of such systems will strengthen our already sound curriculum in neurosurgery education. The Neurological Society of India (NSI) can lead this initiative in India by encouraging its fellow members and trainees to use these systems and also perhaps develop a national portal in lines with the e-logbook initiative to monitor and accredit neurosurgical trainees. The need of the hour in training centers is to inculcate the western concept of “surgical minimums” or a compulsory operative log for each level of the resident training.[8] This would ensure that each trainee has performed a basic requisite of essential procedures both under the supervision and with reasonable independence.[10] This would also help us validate our surgical training programmers with the west.

Simulator-based training, cadaveric labs, and surgical workshops are other feedback-based systems that can advance surgical skill development. Simulation permits trainees to acquire key skills in a controlled environment, essential in a specialty such as neurosurgery where technical error can result in devastating consequences. Rapid progress in technologies such as virtual reality and artificial intelligence have made these systems as realistic as possible. The most significant barrier to implement simulator-based training in India would be the high cost of installation and maintenance.[11] An excellent alternative to this would be to setup cadaveric labs and organize regular workshops as a part of the training curriculum. The Neurosurgery Skills Training Facility and Experimental Laboratory set up at AIIMS have succeeded in this endeavor by offering short- and long-term microneurosurgical fellowships for training young neurosurgeons.[12]

To conclude, postgraduate surgical training in India although being advanced and competitive, needs quantitative and qualitative enhancement with consideration of certification. It will help us provide the society with competent neurosurgeons trained to perform basic minimums with reasonable confidence, expertise, and minimal complications in an independent setting.

A good surgeon doesn't just concentrate on technical ability but also on the appropriateness of what you're doing.

Benjamin Carson

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Garg K, Deora H, Mishra S, Tripathi M, Sadashiva N, Chandra PS, et al. How is neurosurgical residency in India? Results of an anonymized national survey of residents. Neurol India 2019;67:777-82.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
2.
Nanda A, Sonig A. Neurosurgical training in India. World Neurosurg 2013;79:615-20.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Banerji AK. Neurosurgical training and evaluation-Need for a paradigm shift. Neurol India 2016;64:1119-24.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
4.
Ganapathy K. Neurosurgery in India: An Overview. World Neurosurg 2013;79:621-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
The Intercollegiate Surgical Curriculum-Neurosurgery Internet. Available from: https://www.iscp.ac.uk/static/public/syllabus/syllabus_ns_2015.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Sep 01].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Certification Guidelines and Checklists Internet. Joint Committee on Surgical Training. ; Available from: https://www.jcst.org/-/media/files/jcst/certification-guidelines-and-checklists/certification-guidelines--ns-2017-final.pdf. [Last cited on 2019 Aug 28].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
UNIFORM CURRICULUM FOR MCh AND DNB NEUROSURGERY Internet. NSI; Available from: http://www.neurosocietyindia.com/NewLaunch/Download/NSI%20teaching%20curicullum.pdf. [Last accessed on 2019 Sep 01].  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Bell RH. Why Johnny cannot operate. Surgery 2009;146:533-42.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Harrington CM, Kavanagh DO, Ryan D, Dicker P, Lonergan PE, Traynor O, et al. Objective scoring of an electronic surgical logbook: Analysis of impact and observations within a surgical training body. Am J Surg 2017;214:962-8.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Vilanilam GC, Easwer HV, Menon G, Vikram K. “Magister neurochirurgiae”: A 3-year 'crash course' or a 5-year 'punctilious pedagogy'? Neurol India 2017;65:434-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  
11.
Konakondla S, Fong R, Schirmer CM. Simulation training in neurosurgery: Advances in education and practice. Adv Med Educ Pract 2017;8:465-73.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Singh M, Sawarkar D, Sharma BS. Neurosurgery at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, a center of excellence: A success story. Neurol India 2015;63:589-96.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]  [Full text]  


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow