Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1091  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 1    

Recommend this journal


Year : 2018  |  Volume : 66  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 1771--1775

Gadoxetate disodium, a modern hepatospecific MRI contrast agent: Indirect signs for gadolinium deposition in the brain structures with signal intensity increase after intravenous application

1 Department of Radiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Department of Radiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady; Institute of Anatomy, Second Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hana Malikova
Department of Radiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Faculty Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, Srobarova 50, Prague - 10034
Czech Republic
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.246259

Rights and Permissions

Background: Gadolinium brain deposits after intravenous application of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) have been recently reported. Aim: We focused selectively on gadoxetate disodium, a hepatospecific linear GBCA. There are currently only a few studies in peer-reviewed literature focused selectively on gadoxetate disodium with conflicting results. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients (mean age 55.5 ± 14.0 years) after previous repeated administrations of gadoxetate disodium (mean 2.6 ± 1.5) for liver diagnostic process were included. All patients had normal renal and liver functions, an intact blood–brain barrier, and did not receive any other GBCA. They underwent 26 brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with T1WI axial scans for signal intensity (SI) evaluation. The SI changes were measured in globus pallidus (GP), dentate nucleus (DN), pons (Po), and thalamus (Th) and SI ratios (DN/Po, GP/Po, GP/Th, Th/Po) were calculated. The control group consisted of 10 healthy volunteers (mean age 54.8 ± 12.1 years) with no prior GBCA applications. Statistical Analysis: Robust linear regression was used to test the effect of number of applications on the SI ratios. Results: The significant effect of number of gadoxetate previous applications on DN/Po SI ratio was found. On an average, the DN/Po ratio increased by 0.36 percentage points [P = 0.042, 95% CI (0.03, 0.69)]. Other SI ratios were not significantly affected. Conclusions: Repeated administrations of hepatospecific gadoxetate disodium leads to a statistically significant increase in the SI values in DN in patients with normal renal and liver functions, and with an intact blood–brain barrier, probably due to gadolinium deposition.


Print this article     Email this article

Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow