Atormac
brintellex
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 431  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
  »  Article in PDF (374 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed918    
    Printed16    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded47    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
Table of Contents    
AUTHOR’S REPLY
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 64  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 361-362

Author's reply


Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu - 632 004, India

Date of Web Publication3-Mar-2016

Correspondence Address:
Mathew Alexander
Department of Neurology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, Tamil Nadu - 632 004
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


PMID: 26954832

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Alexander M. Author's reply. Neurol India 2016;64:361-2

How to cite this URL:
Alexander M. Author's reply. Neurol India [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 1];64:361-2. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2016/64/2/361/177592


Dear Sir,

The authors read with keen interest the letter to the editor and thank the authors for the valuable comments.

Regarding the natural history of the disease, because of ethical issues, it is no longer possible to study the natural history of untreated disease in a sizable sample. Further, it is equally important to know the natural history of multiple sclerosis treated by various interventions. The course and outcome is likely to fall into more than one pattern that might have a bearing on the overall disability or quality of life.

The next best option would be a population based cohort study like the Canadian or North American multiple sclerosis registry or a hospital based prospective study. [1,2] This paper belongs to this category and the design of the study is quite robust.[3]

The term 'incidence' was used in a non-technical manner to describe the proportions rather than the new cases over a specific period of time (incidence) or number of cases at a given point of time (prevalence).

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
 » References Top

1.
Hurwitz BJ. Registry studies of long term multiple sclerosis outcomes. Neurology 2011:76(Suppl1):S3-6.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Pittock SJ, Mayr WT, McClelland RL, Jorgensen NW, Weigand SD, Noseworthy JH, et al. Disability profile of multiple sclerosis did not change over 10 years in a population based prevalence cohort. Neurology 2004;62:601-6.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Jena SS, Alexander M, Aaron S, Mathew V, Thomas MM, Patil AK, et al. Natural history of multiple sclerosis from the Indian perspective: Experience from a tertiary care hospital. Neurol India 2015;63:866-73.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  




 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
   
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow