Brivazens
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 8681  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  » Next article
  » Previous article 
  » Table of Contents
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
  »  Article in PDF (553 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  References
 »  Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed3034    
    Printed131    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded105    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal

 


 
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 58  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 151-152

Intracranial moving bullet syndrome


Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India

Date of Acceptance23-Oct-2009
Date of Web Publication8-Mar-2010

Correspondence Address:
Alok A Umredkar
Department of Neurosurgery, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.60422

Rights and Permissions



How to cite this article:
Umredkar AA, Mohindra S. Intracranial moving bullet syndrome. Neurol India 2010;58:151-2

How to cite this URL:
Umredkar AA, Mohindra S. Intracranial moving bullet syndrome. Neurol India [serial online] 2010 [cited 2023 Jun 10];58:151-2. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2010/58/1/151/60422


Sir,

Moving bullet within the brain parenchyma is rarely reported. There are a few case reports in the literature exhibiting intracerebral bullet migration, causing progressive neurological deficits. [1],[2],[3] The present report describes a unique case of bullet impaction within the brain parenchyma and its dynamic movement, without any added neurological deficits.

A 39-year-old male suffered a gunshot injury and an open wound at the frontal region. The open wound was sutured, which healed well, and the patient was referred to a higher center. A computed tomography (CT) scan at that time revealed a bullet in the posterior frontal cortex, just lateral to the midline [Figure 1]. As the patient was asymptomatic, no intervention was undertaken. At 5 months of follow-up, the patient underwent check CT scan, which showed bullet migration to the right parieto-occipital region, away from the midline [Figure 2]. Again, the asymptomatic state of the patient prevented us from undertaking bullet extraction. At 2.5 years of follow-up, the patient remains symptom free.

Spontaneous movement of bullets within the brain has been reported sporadically. The removal of intracerebral bullets is obviously warranted in patients undergoing craniotomy or craniectomy for debridement or evacuation of intracerebral clots or bone fragments if the metallic fragment is in proximity to the operative site. [1] Further, neurologic deterioration and diagnostic CT imaging may indicate surgical removal of the bullet. [2] The bullets in the brain may migrate into the adjacent lateral ventricle and move freely as a consequence of gravity. [3] This spontaneous migration of intracerebral bullets is influenced by cerebral softening, the specific gravity of the bullet compared with brain tissue and the sink function of the cerebral ventricles. [3] Hence, it is not only the fire-arm injury but also any foreign body, with a different density as compared to the brain and cerebrospinal fluid, that will migrate intracerebrally. The decision of nonsurgical management is more likely in case of high-velocity bullet injury due to the sterile nature of the bullet. The risk for late complications increases with organic wooden foreign objects such as tree branches and pencils that can harbor bacteria and fragment during removal. [4] Bullet fragment emboli are uncommon, and there have been only a few reports of intracranial-to-extracranial migration of these fragments. [5] Few reports of movement of hemostatic clips from the ventricles through the aqueduct to the lumbar spinal canal have been described. [6] The potential for further neurological injury from migration, formation of neurotoxic breakdown products and the danger of infection are factors to be assessed when considering the removal of retained intracranial metallic foreign bodies. [7] Hence, we open the debate of managing the migrating bullet patient nonsurgically, lest there are neurological deficits.

In conclusion , the extraction of an asymptomatic, moving bullet is not warranted. These patients may be put on regular follow-up. The migration of the bullet should be kept in mind whenever surgical removal is being undertaken.

 
 » References Top

1.Karabagli H. Spontaneous movement of bullets in the interhemispheric region. Pediatr Neurosurg 2005;41:148-50.  Back to cited text no. 1      
2.Zafonte RD, Watanabe T, Mann NR. Moving bullet syndrome: A complication of penetrating head injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998;79:1469-72.  Back to cited text no. 2      
3.Milhorat TH, Elowitz EH, Johnson RW, Miller JI. Spontaneous movement of bullets in the brain. Neurosurgery 1993;32:140-3.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Aulino JM, Gyure KA, Morton A, Cole JW. Temporal lobe intraparenchymal retained foreign body from remote orbital trauma. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1855-7.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Hughes BD, vender JR. Delayed lead pulmonary emboli after a gunshot wound to the head. J Neurosurg 2006;105:233-4.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.Sörensen N, Krauss J. Movement of hemostatic clips from the ventricles through the aqueduct to the lumbar spinal canal. Case report. J Neurosurg 1991;74:143-6.  Back to cited text no. 6      
7.Ott K, Tarlov E, Crowell R, Papadakis N. Retained intracranial metallic foreign bodies. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 1976;44:80-3.  Back to cited text no. 7      


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow