Leveron&Nexovas
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1848  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  » Next article
  » Previous article 
  » Table of Contents
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (481 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Materials and Me...
 »  Results
 »  Discussion
 »  References
 »  Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4573    
    Printed245    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded131    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 20    

Recommend this journal

 


 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 57  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 739-743

Does intravenous rtPA benefit patients in the absence of CT angiographically visible intracranial occlusion?


1 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta; Ananthapuri Hospitals and Research Institute, Kerala, India
2 Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta; University of Dresden, Germany
3 Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta
4 Department of Clinical Neurosciences,Calgary Stroke Program, Calgary, Alberta

Date of Acceptance10-Sep-2009
Date of Web Publication30-Jan-2010

Correspondence Address:
P N Sylaja
Department of Neurology, Ananthapuri Hospitals and Research Institute, Trivandrum, India

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), New Delhi for financial support extended to the ‘Central Molecular Genetics Laboratory for Neurology and Psychiatry’., Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.59469

Rights and Permissions

 » Abstract 

Background : In patients with acute stroke receiving intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), we postulated that the presence of intracranial occlusion on CT angiography (CTA) modifies the benefit of thrombolysis. Materials and Methods : Using a retrospective cohort design, we identified patients with acute ischemic stroke in our CTA database between May 2002 and August 2007. All the patients had a CTA within 12 h of onset, a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) #1, and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score(NIHSS)f $6. The primary outcome was early effectiveness of tPA defined as an NIHSS score of #2 at 24 h or a 4-point NIHSS improvement at 24 h. Secondary outcome included mRS #1 at 90 days. The relationship between intracranial occlusion on CTA and benefit of tPA was assessed using a test for interaction. Results : A total of 287 patients met the criteria [occlusion present N =168; (98 with tPA; 70 without tPA) and occlusion absent N = 119; (52 with tPA; 67 without tPA)]. Those with intracranial occlusion were likely to have more severe strokes (NIHSS $15; P < 0.001) and abnormal brain imaging (ASPECTS #7; P < 0.001). For outcome of 4-point NIHSS score improvement at 24 h, benefit from tPA was observed only among patients with a visible occlusion (absolute difference in favor of tPA: 20.4% vs. 0.7%; P = 0.06). Conclusion : In patients with acute ischemic stroke, thrombolysis produced a better early clinical response among patients with intracranial occlusion, which needs to be confirmed in stroke thrombolysis trials.


Keywords: Computed tomography angiography, intracranial occlusion, thrombolysis


How to cite this article:
Sylaja P N, Dzialowski I, Puetz V, Eliasziw M, Hill MD, Krol A, O'Reilly C, Demchuk AM. Does intravenous rtPA benefit patients in the absence of CT angiographically visible intracranial occlusion?. Neurol India 2009;57:739-43

How to cite this URL:
Sylaja P N, Dzialowski I, Puetz V, Eliasziw M, Hill MD, Krol A, O'Reilly C, Demchuk AM. Does intravenous rtPA benefit patients in the absence of CT angiographically visible intracranial occlusion?. Neurol India [serial online] 2009 [cited 2023 Feb 8];57:739-43. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2009/57/6/739/59469



 » Introduction Top


Intravenous thrombolysis is thought to be effective for all subtypes of acute ischemic stroke, including subcortical strokes based upon the NINDS tPA Stroke trial. [1] However subtyping of the stroke in this trial had limitations as advanced imaging was not available at that time. Thrombolysis has significant benefit when early recanalization is achieved in patients with intracranial occlusion. [2],[3] Controversy exists regarding whether similar benefits are observed with lacunar or nonocclusive stroke. It is yet unclear whether thrombolysis should be given to patients without a large vessel occlusion. Angiographic studies have shown that a large proportion (19-39%) of patients with acute ischemic stroke have no vessel occlusion. [4],[5],[6],[7] This probably occurs because of spontaneous autolysis of thrombus and a non-visible occlusion among lacunar strokes. A recent study of patients treated with tPA showed better outcome in those without intracranial occlusion, as assessed by CT angiography (CTA), but a control group was not available. [7] It remains unclear if thrombolysis will benefit patients without a large vessel occlusion.

CTA is widely available and provides a rapid and accurate means of assessing intracranial vascular occlusion in an acute setting. [8],[9],[10],[11] The aim of the present study was to determine whether the presence of intracranial occlusion, identified from CTA, modified the response to thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke.


 » Materials and Methods Top


Patients presenting to the emergency room with acute ischemic stroke between May 2002 and August 2007 were identified from the CTA database at Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta. Patients were included in the present study if they had an acute ischemic stroke and had a CTA performed within 12 h of symptom onset. In addition, they were required to have had a premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) score #1 and a baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score $6. In our centre, unless contraindicated all patients with acute stroke routinely undergo CT angiography before thrombolysis. We usually get a CT head followed immediately by a CT angiography which takes only an additional 5-10 min. All patients who came within 3 h of symptom onset were treated with tPA regardless of the findings on CT angiography,according to the current guidelines. Patients who received tPA prior to their CTA and patients who received any intraarterial device-based interventions were excluded. Neurological and functional outcomes were recorded prospectively at 24 h and at 90 days in the stroke clinic. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board.

The non-contrast CT (NCCT) scan was performed on a multislice scanner (GE Medical Systems or Siemens) using 120 kV, 170 mAs with 5-mm slice thickness. CTA acquisitions were obtained after a single bolus injection of 90-120 ml of iodinated non-ionic contrast into the anticubital vein at 3-4 ml/sec with a 20-25 sec delay to start imaging. The imaging was autotriggered by the appearance of the contrast agent on the ascending aorta. The image sequence covered the foramen magnum to centrum semiovale with 0.6-mm to 1-mm slice thickness. Source images were reconstructed at 1.25, 2.5, and 4-mm slice thickness in coronal, axial, and sagittal planes. Intracranial vessel status was assessed routinely by a neuroradiologist using source images and three-dimensional (3-D) reformats for any occlusion. The Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) was determined by a three-reader consensus (one stroke neurologist and two stroke fellows) from the baseline NCCT scan. We independently rated the occurrence of hemorrhagic transformation on the 12-36 h follow-up NCCT and was classified as parenchymal hematoma (PH) or hemorrhagic infarction (HI).

Statistical analysis

The primary outcome was a measure of the early effectiveness of tPA, defined as an NIHSS score #2 at 24 h, which has been shown to be the most powerful binary measure of early tPA effectiveness in the NINDS tPA Stroke trial. [12] Another binary outcome, used to complement the primary outcome, was an improvement of $4 points from the baseline NIHSS to the 24-h NIHSS score. This outcome was used to assess tPA effectiveness in Part I of the NINDS trial. [1],[13] The secondary outcome was a measure of the long-term efficacy of tPA defined as an mRS score #1 at 90 days. The presence (or absence) of intracranial occlusion was used as a stratification factor in the analyses. The effectiveness of tPA within stratum was tested for statistical significance using a Chi-square test. Binomial regression with a log link was used to test for interaction with regards to the effectiveness of tPA in the presence and absence of intracranial occlusion, after adjusting for potential demographic and clinical confounders. We considered an a = 0.10 for the assessment of the interaction terms as a threshold for determining significance. [14] All other comparisons were made using a = 0.05.


 » Results Top


A total of 287 patients met the eligibility criteria. One hundred and sixty-eight had CT-angiographic evidence of intracranial occlusion (98 received tPA and 70 no rtPA) and 119 did not have intracranial occlusion (52 received tPA and 67 no rtPA). Patients with an intracranial occlusion were significantly more likely to have a more severe stroke (NIHSS $15) and more likely to have significant extent of early ischemic changes on NCCT scan (ASPECTS #7) [Table 1]. Except for these two factors, the frequencies of all other characteristics were similar across both stratum and treatment arms [Table 1]. None of the demographic and clinical characteristics were identified as confounders from the regression analyses. Unadjusted results are, therefore, reported in [Table 2].

In the assessment of the early effectiveness of tPA, early response from tPA was observed only among patients who had a visible intracranial occlusion on baseline CTA [Table 2]. The absolute increase in responders was 10.4% for NIHSS #2 at 24 h and 20.4% for 4-point or greater improvement in NIHSS at 24 h compared to no rtPA group. Among patients without an intracranial occlusion visible on baseline CTA, the responder rates for NIHSS <2 at 24 h and 4-point or greater improvement in NIHSS at 24 h were similar for those who received and did not receive tPA (-0.1, 0.7%). This did not translate to 90-day outcomes as the visible occlusion group had a non-significant absolute increase in responders of 2.8% for NIHSS #2 at three months and 1.9% for 4-point or more improvement in NIHSS at three months compared to baseline. Among patients without a visible occlusion, the responder rates were similar to the occlusion group with NIHSS <2 at three months and 4-point or greater improvement of NIHSS at three months compared to baseline of -1.8% with rtPA treatment and -0.4% without rtPA treatment. No differences in responder rates with and without occlusion in setting of tPA treatment were seen with mRS <2 at three months [Table 2]. As expected, the rate of parenchymal hematoma was higher among patients who received rtPA [Table 3]. The presence of visible occlusion did not significantly alter the occurrence of hemorrhage.


 » Discussion Top


The present study demonstrates that patients with intracranial occlusion on CTA are more likely to have early clinical response if rtPA is administered. This does not appear to be the case in the absence of CT angiographically visible intracranial occlusion. This early benefit of rtPA in the presence of intracranial occlusion did not however carry forward to differences in 90-day outcome.

Previous studies have suggested an excellent risk benefit ratio for rtPA treatment in the absence of visible intracranial occlusion. Higher rates of early improvement and lower rates of intracranial hemorrhage were seen in patients with a patent vasculature treated with rtPA. [5] The difficulty with these studies is the lack of a comparison group of patients who did not receive rtPA. It is intuitive that stroke patients without visible intracranial occlusion have better outcomes due to smaller regions of brain ischemia. Verro et al., confirmed this by demonstrating a high rate of good outcome (83%) in conservatively managed patients without intracranial occlusion. [15] But a recent study has also shown a less than 50% excellent outcome after tPA at three months in the absence of a visible intracranial occlusion and the rate of symptomatic hemorrhage after tPA` is similar in these patients. [16] Supporting the rationale for targeting patients with rtPA if there is intracranial occlusion is the recently completed DIAS 2 trial evaluating desmoteplase in ischemic stroke patients. [17] This trial demonstrated a robust treatment effect of this thrombolytic agent if intracranial occlusion was visible on MRI or CTA. This has resulted in a planned trial (DIAS-3) which will randomize patients to thrombolysis with desmoteplase only if intracranial occlusion is visible.

Thrombolysis works by achieving early recanalization. The absence of occlusion target for recanalization would suggest a muted clinical effect at best. A variety of explanations have been postulated for the benefit of tPA without visible occlusion. Lacunar infarction which represents 20% of all ischemic stroke may benefit from tPA by recanalization of a small arteriolar occlusion not visible on CTA. [18] Distal occlusions which are difficult to accurately identify by CTA could also be a target for tPA-induced recanalization. These populations might be better identified by CT perfusion techniques which are exquisitely sensitive to detecting cerebral blood flow disturbances even in small volumes. [7]

This study has limitations since it is not a randomized controlled trial. The control population who did not receive tPA had contraindication and hence is not an ideal comparison group. Any baseline differences were adjusted for in the analysis to account for this. CTA is not 100% sensitive and specific for angiographically confirmed intracranial occlusion and may have missed distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusions or small perforator occlusions. CT angiographic techniques continue to evolve with new CT scanner techniques which now can combine CTA and CT perfusion with a single bolus of contrast. The choice of early clinical response measures to evaluate tPA response is based on work by Broderick et al. The early effectiveness of tPA in the NINDS rtPA Stroke Study was best identified with NIHSS score of #2 at 24 h. [12] Also chosen for this study was the 4-point or greater improvement in NIHSS which was the primary outcome in the NINDS Part I study. In addition since we have included only patients with a NIHSS score of >5, the results are applicable only to those with moderate and severe strokes.

This data is hypothesis-generating but should not yet influence current rtPA decision-making. We feel further study of the role of rtPA in the absence of intracranial occlusion is warranted. Ongoing randomized trials of thrombolysis such as the International Stroke Trial-3 and DIAS-3 can answer the question of the value of rtPA in the non-occlusive setting if baseline CT angiographic data is obtained.

 
 » References Top

1.The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA stroke study group. Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med 1995;333:1581-7.  Back to cited text no. 1  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
2.Rha JH, Saver JL. The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: A meta analysis. Stroke 2007;38:967-73.  Back to cited text no. 2  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
3.Molina CA, Alexandrov AV, Demchuk AM, Saqqur M, Uchino K, Alvarez-Sabin J. Improving the predictive accuracy of recanalization on stroke outcome in patients treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Stroke 2004;35:151-7.  Back to cited text no. 3      
4.Lewandowski CA, Frankel M, Tomsick TA, Broderick J, Frey J, Clark W, et al. Combined intravenous and intra arterial r-tPA versus intraarterial therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Stroke 1999;30:2598-605.  Back to cited text no. 4      
5.Wolpert S, Bruckmann H, Green lee R, Wechsler L, Pessin M, del Zoppo G. Neuroradiologic evaluation of patients with acute stroke treated with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1993;14:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 5      
6.del Zoppo GJ, Higashida RT, Furlan AJ, Pessin MS, Rowley HA, Gent M. PROACT: A phase II randomized trial of recombinant prourokinase by direct arterial delivery in acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Stroke 1998;29:4-11.  Back to cited text no. 6  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
7.Sims JR, Rordorf G, Smith EE, Koroshetz WJ, Lev MH, Buonanno F, et al. Arterial occlusion revealed by CT angiography predicts NIH Stroke score and acute outcomes after IV tPA treatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:246-51.  Back to cited text no. 7      
8.Knauth M, von Kummer R, Jansen O, Hahnel S, Dorfler A, Sartor K. Potential of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1001-10.  Back to cited text no. 8      
9.Lev MH, Farkas J, Rodriguez VR, Schwamm LH, Hunter GJ, Putman CM, et al. CT angiography in the rapid triage of patients with hyperacute stroke to intra-arterial thrombolysis: Accuracy in the detection of large vessel thrombus. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2001;25:520-8.  Back to cited text no. 9      
10.Shrier DA, Tanaka H, Numaguchi Y, Konno S, Patel U, Shibata D. CT angiography in the evaluation of acute stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1011-20.  Back to cited text no. 10  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
11.Wildermuth S, Knauth M, Brandt T, Winter R, Sartor K, Hacke W. Role of CT angiography in patient selection for thrombolytic therapy in acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1998;29:935-8.  Back to cited text no. 11  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
12.Broderick JP, Lu M, Kothari R, Levine SR, Lyden PD, Haley EC, et al. Finding the most powerful measures of the effectiveness of tissue plasminogen activator in the NINDS tPA stroke trial. Stroke 2000;31:2335-41.  Back to cited text no. 12      
13.Haley HC, Lewandowski C, Tilley BC; NINDS rt-PA Stroke Study Group. Myths regarding the NINDS rt-PA Stroke trial: Setting the record straight. Ann Emerg Med 1997;30:676-82.  Back to cited text no. 13      
14.Generalized efficacy of t-PA for acute stroke: Subgroup analysis of the NINDS t-PA Stroke Trial. Stroke 1997;28:2119-25.  Back to cited text no. 14      
15.Verro P, Tanenbaum LN, Borden N, Eshkar N, Sen S. Clinical application of CT angiography in acute ischemic stroke. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007;109:138-45.  Back to cited text no. 15  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
16.Mikulik R, Goldemund D, Reif M, Aulicky P, Krupa P. Outcome of patients with negative CT angiography results for arterial occlusion treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Stroke 2009;40:868-72.  Back to cited text no. 16  [PUBMED]  [FULLTEXT]  
17.Hacke W, Albers G, Al-Rawi Y, Bogousslavsky J, Davalos A, Eliasziw M, et al. The Desmoteplase in acute ischemic stroke trial (DIAS): A phase II MRI- based 9-hour window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 2005;36:66-73.  Back to cited text no. 17      
18.Adams HP, del Zoppo G, Alberts MJ, Bhatt DL, Brass L, Furlan A, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: A guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists. Stroke 2007;38:1655-711.z  Back to cited text no. 18      



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]

This article has been cited by
1 The Role of Cerebral CT Angiogram in Subacute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Events
Ghazi Alshumrani, Fares Alzahrani, Ahmad Alamri, Abdullah Murhaf Al-Khani, Shehata Shehata, Abdullah Alsabaani, Adel Alhazzani
The Neurologist. 2022; 27(2): 65
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Multimodal CT in Acute Stroke
R. Wannamaker, B. Buck, K. Butcher
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2019; 19(9)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Detection of single-phase CTA occult vessel occlusions in acute ischemic stroke using CT perfusion-based wavelet-transformed angiography
Wolfgang G. Kunz,Wieland H. Sommer,Lukas Havla,Franziska Dorn,Felix G. Meinel,Olaf Dietrich,Grete Buchholz,Birgit Ertl-Wagner,Kolja M. Thierfelder
European Radiology. 2017; 27(6): 2657
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 The Role of Vascular Imaging in the Initial Assessment of Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke
Emmad Qazi,Fahad S. Al-Ajlan,Mohamed Najm,Bijoy K. Menon
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 2016; 16(4)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Impact of thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke without occlusion: an observational comparative study
N. Ajili,J. P. Decroix,C. Preda,J. Labreuche,D. Lopez,Y. Bejot,P. Michel,M. Sévin-Allouet,I. Sibon,S. Vergnet,A. Wang,N. Sanda,M. Mazighi,F. Bourdain,B. Lapergue
European Journal of Neurology. 2016; 23(8): 1380
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Imaging in acute stroke
Prasanna Eswaradass,Ramana Appireddy,James Evans,Carol Tham,Sadanand Dey,Mohamed Najm,Bijoy K. Menon
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2016; 14(8): 963
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 Influence of Arterial Occlusion on Outcome After Intravenous Thrombolysis for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Friedrich Medlin, Michael Amiguet, Peter Vanacker, Patrik Michel
Stroke. 2015; 46(1): 126
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Role of Imaging in Current Acute Ischemic Stroke Workflow for Endovascular Therapy
Bijoy K. Menon, Bruce C.V. Campbell, Christopher Levi, Mayank Goyal
Stroke. 2015; 46(6): 1453
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Multimodal Computed Tomography Based Definition of Cerebral Imaging Profiles for Acute Stroke Reperfusion Therapy (CT-DEFINE): Results of a Prospective Observational Study
K. Barlinn,J. Seibt,K. Engellandt,J. Gerber,V. Puetz,J. Kepplinger,O. Wunderlich,L.-P. Pallesen,U. Bodechtel,R. Koch,R. von Kummer,I. Dzialowski
Clinical Neuroradiology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Therapeutic efficacy of brain imaging in acute ischemic stroke patients
Rüdiger von Kummer,Imanuel Dzialowski,Johannes Gerber
Journal of Neuroradiology. 2014;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 Imaging of acute stroke prior to treatment: current practice and evolving techniques
G Mair,J M Wardlaw
The British Journal of Radiology. 2014; 87(1040): 20140216
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Without Arterial Occlusion at Presentation
Sourabh Lahoti, Sankalp Gokhale, Louis Caplan, Patrik Michel, Yves Samson, Charlotte Rosso, Kaustubh Limaye, Archana Hinduja, Aneesh Singhal, Syed Ali, Luther Creed Pettigrew, Richard Kryscio, Nikita Dedhia, Shirish Hastak, David S. Liebeskind
Stroke. 2014; 45(9): 2722
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Reliability of brain CT evaluation by stroke neurologists in telemedicine
Puetz, V. and Bodechtel, U. and Gerber, J.C. and Dzialowski, I. and Kunz, A. and Wolz, M. and Hentschel, H. and Schultheiss, T. and Kepplinger, J. and Schneider, H. and Wiedemann, B. and Wojciechowski, C. and Reichmann, H. and Gahn, G. and Von Kummer, R.
Neurology. 2013; 80(4): 332-338
[Pubmed]
14 The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (DIAS) clinical trial program
von Kummer, R. and Albers, G.W. and Mori, E. and Chabriat, H. and Chang, K.-C. and Dávalos, A. and Ford, G. and Grotta, J. and Kaste, M. and Shuaib, A. and Schwamm, L. and Yamaguchi, T. and Minematsu, K. and Nakagawara, J.
International Journal of Stroke. 2012; 7(7): 589-596
[Pubmed]
15 Thrombolytic therapy for acute ischaemic stroke: What can we do to improve outcomes?
Demchuk, A.M. and Bal, S.
Drugs. 2012; 72(14): 1833-1845
[Pubmed]
16 Treatment of acute ischemic stroke: Systemic or local?
Von Kummer, R. and Gerber, J.
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012; 1268(1): 79-84
[Pubmed]
17 The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke (DIAS) clinical trial program
Rüdiger von Kummer,Gregory W Albers,Etsuro Mori
International Journal of Stroke. 2012; 7(7): 589
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Treatment of acute ischemic stroke: systemic or local?
Rüdiger von Kummer,Johannes Gerber
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2012; 1268(1): 79
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Ischaemic Stroke
Andrew M. Demchuk,Simerpreet Bal
Drugs. 2012; 72(14): 1833
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Computed Tomography Angiography in the Assessment of Patients With Stroke/TIA
Bijoy K. Menon,Andrew M. Demchuk
The Neurohospitalist. 2011; 1(4): 187
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow