Brivazens
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 2823  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 »   Next article
 »   Previous article
 »   Table of Contents

 Resource Links
 »   Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
 »   Citation Manager
 »   Access Statistics
 »   Reader Comments
 »   Email Alert *
 »   Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed21502    
    Printed372    
    Emailed14    
    PDF Downloaded548    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 19    

Recommend this journal

 

 REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2005  |  Volume : 53  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 416--423

Odontoid screw fixation for fresh and remote fractures


Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah - 84132, USA

Correspondence Address:
Ronald I Apfelbaum
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, 30 North 1900 East, Suite 3B409, Salt Lake City, Utah - 84132
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0028-3886.22607

Rights and Permissions

Fractures of the odontoid process are common, accounting for 10% to 20% of all cervical spine fractures. Odontoid process fractures are classified into three types depending on the location of the fracture line. Various treatment options are available for each of these fracture types and include application of a cervical orthosis, direct anterior screw fixation, and posterior cervical fusion. If a patient requires surgical treatment of an odontoid process fracture, the timing of treatment may affect fusion rates, particularly if direct anterior odontoid screw fixation is selected as the treatment method. For example, type II odontoid fractures treated within the first 6 months of injury with direct anterior odontoid screw fixation have an 88% fusion rate, whereas fractures treated after 18 months have only a 25% fusion rate. In this review, we discuss the etiology, biomechanics, diagnosis, and treatment (including factors affecting fusion such as timing and fracture orientation) options available for odontoid process fractures.






[FULL TEXT] [PDF]*


        
Print this article     Email this article

Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow