|
| Article Access Statistics | | | Viewed | 3452 | | | Printed | 115 | | | Emailed | 0 | | | PDF Downloaded | 100 | | | Comments | [Add] | | |
|
Click on image for details.
|
|
| LETTER TO EDITOR |
|
|
|
| Year : 2003 | Volume
: 51
| Issue : 2 | Page : 285-286 |
Predicting long-term morbidity in Indian patients with ische mic stroke
Kumar S
Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamilnadu- 632004
Correspondence Address:
Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, Tamilnadu- 632004
[email protected]
How to cite this article:
Kumar S. Predicting long-term morbidity in Indian patients with ische mic stroke
. Neurol India 2003;51:285-6 |
Sir,
I read with great interest the recent article by Panicker JN et al.[1] Based on a prospective study, they conclude that patients with upper limb power of grade 3/5 or less, aphasia or CRP positivity have greater disability at six months as assessed by Barthel's index of activities of daily living. I would like to make certain observations.
Firstly, data regarding the percentage of patients with severe disability at six months has not been provided. Also, it is not clear whether patients who expired were included in the final analysis. It would be more meaningful to include expired patients in the severely disabled group for final analysis.
Secondly, I have concerns regarding the mode of follow up- telephonic and postal. The information provided by relatives may have been correct but it could have been otherwise too. Researchers were not blinded and this could also lead to bias in the results obtained. In addition, we need to assess parameters other than those that can be assessed by Barthel's index for predicting long-term outcome in stroke. These include presence of cognitive impairment, post-stroke seizures, and vascular parkinsonism. A physician could best assess these.
The most robust predictors of disability at five years after stroke were found to be increasing age, stroke severity and recurrent strokes.[2] In the present study, the authors have confirmed the point about stroke severity (upper limb power of grade 3/5 or less and presence of aphasia), however data regarding the role of increasing age and recurrent strokes on the outcome has not been elaborated.
The most important finding of this study is that C reactive protein (CRP) positivity at admission predicts a greater disability at six months. However, the timing of CRP assessment (in relation to stroke onset) is not clear from the study. It was found in an earlier study[3] that a CRP increase between 12 to 24 hours after symptom onset predicts an unfavorable outcome, whereas a CRP rise within 12 hours of symptom onset is not independently related to poor outcome. However, in another study,[4] CRP at discharge (as against within 24 hours or between 48-72 hours after stroke onset) was better related to one-year outcome.
| 1. | Panicker JN, Thomas M, Pavithran K, Nair D, Sarma PS. Morbidity predictors in ischemic stroke. Neurology India 2003;51:49-51.  [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 2. | Hankey GJ. Long-term outcome after alchemic stroke/transient ischemic attack. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2003;16(Suppl 1):14-9. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 3. | Winbeck K, Poppert H, Etgen T, Conrad B, Sander D. Prognostic relevance of early serial C-reactive protein measurements after first ischemic stroke. Stroke 2002;33:2459-64. [PUBMED] [FULLTEXT] |
| 4. | Di Napoli M, Papa F, Bocola V. C-reactive protein in ischemic stroke: an independent prognostic factor. Stroke 2001;32:917-24. |
|
