Atormac
brintellex
Neurology India
menu-bar5 Open access journal indexed with Index Medicus
  Users online: 1629  
 Home | Login 
About Editorial board Articlesmenu-bullet NSI Publicationsmenu-bullet Search Instructions Online Submission Subscribe Videos Etcetera Contact
  Navigate Here 
 Search
 
  » Next article
  » Previous article 
  » Table of Contents
  
 Resource Links
  »  Similar in PUBMED
 »  Search Pubmed for
 »  Search in Google Scholar for
 »Related articles
  »  Article in PDF (63 KB)
  »  Citation Manager
  »  Access Statistics
  »  Reader Comments
  »  Email Alert *
  »  Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


  In this Article
 »  Abstract
 »  Introduction
 »  Material and methods
 »  Results
 »  Discussion
 »  Conclusion
 »  References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed16907    
    Printed281    
    Emailed29    
    PDF Downloaded395    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 15    

Recommend this journal

   
Year : 2000  |  Volume : 48  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 243-8

Cervical spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in adults.


Department of Neurosurgery, Command Hospital (Central Command), Lucknow, 226002, India.

Correspondence Address:
Department of Neurosurgery, Command Hospital (Central Command), Lucknow, 226002, India.

  »  Abstract

Spinal cord injury occurring without concomitant radiologically demonstrable trauma to the skeletal elements of the spinal canal rim, or compromise of the spinal canal rim without fracture, is a rare event. Though documented in children, the injury is not very well reported in adults. We present seventeen adult patients with spinal cord injury without accompanying fracture of the spinal canal rim, or vertebral dislocation, seen over seven years. None had preexisting spinal canal stenosis or cervical spondylosis. Following trauma, these patients had weakness of all four limbs. They were evaluated by MRI (CT scan in one patient), which showed hypo / isointense lesion in the cord on T1 weighted images, and hyperintensity on T2 weighted images, suggesting cord contusion or oedema. MRI was normal in two patients. With conservative management, fifteen patients showed neurological improvement, one remained quadriplegic and one died. With increasing use of MRI in the evaluation of traumatic myelopathy, such injuries will be diagnosed more often. The mechanism of injury is probably acute stretching of the cord as in flexion and torsional strain. Management is essentially conservative and prognosis is better than that seen in patients with fracture or dislocation of cervical spine.

How to cite this article:
Bhatoe H S. Cervical spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in adults. Neurol India 2000;48:243


How to cite this URL:
Bhatoe H S. Cervical spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality in adults. Neurol India [serial online] 2000 [cited 2020 Dec 2];48:243. Available from: https://www.neurologyindia.com/text.asp?2000/48/3/243/1528




   »   Introduction Top

Spinal cord injury without radiological abnormality (SCIWORA) is a syndrome of cervical spinal cord trauma, describing post traumatic myelopathy without evidence of vertebral fracture or mal-alignment on plain radiographs or on computed tomography. The injury is documented in children, probably due to increased elasticity of the paediatric spine. It is not described very well in adults with normal spinal canals, although the elderly patients with osteoarthrotic spines and stenosed cervical canals can suffer traumatic spinal cord damage without accompanying vertebral injury.[1] We present 17 young adults with isolated cervical cord injury, without accompanying vertebral dislocation or fracture involving the spinal canal rim. Relevant literature is briefly reviewed.

   »   Material and methods Top

Over a period of seven years (1992-98), we managed 17 young adults with traumatic cervical myelopathy. None of these patients had features of preexisting cervical spondylosis. Only those patients with traumatic cervical myelopathy were included who did not have (a) radiologically demonstrable fracture or dislocation corresponding to the clinical level of myelopathy (b) radiologically demonstrable fracture of the spinal canal rim at clinical level of myelopathy. It meant that patients with fractures of spinous or transverse process, but with intact spinal canal, could be included in the study.


   »   Results Top

17 adult patients with traumatic cervical myelopathy who met the criteria mentioned above were included in the study. There were sixteen males and one female. All the patients were below 40 years of age, the youngest being a 17-year-old male. There was no previous history pertaining to the cervical spine. History of neck hyperflexion was available in [eight] patients, hyperextension in three, and torsional strain in four patients. Two patients sustained gunshot wound involving only the soft tissues of the neck.
Neurological deficit was noticed immediately after the injury. Myelopathy was present in all the patients at the time of admission. The pattern of deficits was recorded according to Benzel and Larson neurological grading[2] on admission [Table I] and [Table II]. There were two patients with features of cervicomedullary involvement (nystagmus, quadriparesis with predominant weakness of upper limbs). Two patients had unilateral Horner's syndrome (including one with gunshot wound to his neck). Ten patients complained of dysaesthesia. Twelve patients had neurogenic bladder dysfunction (retention of urine, uninhibited bladder).
Imaging : Cervical spine radiographs showed straightening of the lordotic curve in one and no abnormality in fourteen patients. One patient had chip fracture of anteroinferior part of C4 vertebral body and two had fractures of tips of spinous processes.
MRI study was done in 16 cases and computed tomography (CT) is one. MRI could be done within 24 hours in one and within 10 days in 15 patients. Results of these imaging procedures are given in [Table III]. Commonest finding on T1WI was isointense or hypointense spinal cord swelling at the site of lesion [Figure. 1], which appeared hyperintense on T2WI. Three patients had diffuse hyperintensity involving two cord segments [Figure. 2],3). MRI was normal in two patients, including one with gunshot wound to his neck. No correlation could be made between the direction of the injuring force and MRI appearance of the injured spinal cord. None of the patients had cervical canal stenosis. Patients with compressive lesions like spinal epidural haematoma and ruptured cervical disc with myelopathy were excluded from the study.
Management : All patients were managed conservatively with care of back, administration of corticosteroids, care of bladder functions and physiotherapy. Ambulation was encouraged at the
earliest, which was usually by 7 to 14 days after injury.
Clinical Course and Outcome : One patient died seventy two hours after the injury and autopsy showed extensive intramedullary haemorrhage at C4-C5, with intact spine [Figure. 4]. Two patients (with normal MRI) had complete neurological recovery within 96 hours of injury. All other patients improved in their functional neurological grades, except one patient who remained quadriplegic.



   »   Discussion Top

Cervical spinal cord can rarely be injured without a concomitant injury to either discocorporeal or discoligamentous structures. Such an injury is described in children, in whom the cervical spine has increased range of movements, including hyperflexion, hyperextension and distraction. Pang and Wilberger[3] coined the term spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA) to distinguish this injury from traumatic myelopathy with disruption of skeletal elements of the cervical spine. This injury is not described very well in young adults with normal spinal canals. Patients may have distant unrelated fractures of the cervical spine such as chip fracture of the anterior part of the vertebral body, or that of spinous and transverse processes while retaining the integrity of the bony rim of the normal spinal canal. The injury has to be distinguished from central cord syndrome following trauma in the elderly, who often have osteoarthritic spines, and hyperextension may cause the cervical spinal cord to be pinched between the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL) and hypertrophied ligamentum flavum, leading to intramedullary haemorrhage and central infarction of the spinal cord.[1]
Pathogenesis of Spinal Cord Injury : Spinomedullary Dynamics : Spinal cord is a viscoelastic tissue exhibiting adaptive properties according to the time distribution following stretch or compression of the cord. Equally important is the reciprocal behavioral adaptation of the meninges to neutralize the stretching of the cord. The spinal canal lengthens between 5 and 9.7 cm depending on individual variation, during extension to maximum flexion[4] The osteoligamentous sheath represented by the spinal canal is deformable in normal mechanics of movement. The requirements of movements are thus naturally and passively sustained by the spinal cord and nerve roots. During non physiological movements of excessive amplitudes, the nervous structures can be subjected to strain which exceeds their capacity to adapt. It is thus likely that SCIWORA represents those cases where the force was sufficient to cause cord damage but was unable to damage the discocorporeal or discoligamentous structures.
Although the exact mechanism of injury to the cervical spinal cord in adults with normal spinal canal is uncertain, some analogy to similar injuries seen in children may be derived. The spinal cord can get damaged while the spine remains intact during non physiological conditions with excessive amplitude, even if for a short time. Such non physiological movement may involve hyperextension or hyperflexion of the spine, torsional strain, distraction along the longitudinal axis or concussive wave as in missile injuries of the neck.
Hyperflexion causes the maximum stretching of the cord.[5] Prolonged neck flexion under anaesthesia, or Cervical Spinal Cord Injury acute hyperflexion may also result in impairment of blood flow to the cord. Tethering of the cord by the dentate ligament further worsens the condition.[6] Likewise, chiropractic manipulation of the neck has been reported to cause vertebrobasilar insufficiency or occlusion, leading to cord infarction and quadriplegia.[7],[8]
Hyperextension of the neck can damage the cervical cord.[9],[10] Greatest cord compression occurs between C3 and C6 due to pinching of the cord between the ligamentum flavum and PLL.[9] Rotatory acceleration may result in spinal cord damage in a manner similar to diffuse axonal injury (DAI) in the brain, since the
shearing forces are generated in the spinal cord where the pia is restrained more than the rest of the cord by the dentate ligament and spinal nerve roots; grey matter in the spinal cord gets damaged by rotatory acceleration.[11]
Gunshot wounds of the soft tissues of the neck can damage the spinal cord either by avulsing the nerve roots from the cord and producing haematomyelia, or by concussion wave. Blast or concussive forces cause temporary neurological impairment, as seen in high velocity missile injuries, and support the concept of concussive theory. Shock waves can be followed by spinal cord oedema. Concussive forces are less with low velocity civilian injuries, which are more likely to damage the cord by avulsing the root and causing intramedullary haemorrhage.[12]
It has been hypothesised that there are two mechanisms for damage to the spinal cord after injury the primary mechanical injury to the axons andmicrovasculature, and a secondary injury due to one or more additional damaging processes initiated by the primary injury.[13],[14] Secondary cord injury occurs due to thrombosis, platelet aggregation or vasospasm of arterioles traversing the grey matter to supply the white matter.[15] The ischaemic insult is compounded by impairment of autoregulation in the injured spinal cord, especially in the presence of systemic hypotension.[16] Since there is no continuing or unrelieved compression of the spinal cord or vertebral instability in SCIWORA, the role of secondary factors is debatable.
Clinical Picture : It is unusual to have a picture of complete cord transection. An incomplete cord lesion-whether central cord syndrome,anterior cord syndrome or myelopathy with sensory and motor involvement - is usually seen. The classical findings of quadriparesis with upper limbs affected more than the lower limbs may not always be seen.[17] There may be dysaesthesiae over the trunk and limbs, Horner's syndrome, and neurogenic bladder dysfunction. Dysaesthesiae often persist even after neurological recovery.
Imaging : The cervical spine radiographs usually do not show any abnormality. Flexion and extension views are essential to exclude instability. MRI is being increasingly used in the evaluation of post traumatic myelopathy. Its importance lies in not only in its ability to image the injured cord, but also to prognosticate the outcome.[7],[18] Significant changes in signal intensity, whether due to haemorrhage, contusion or oedema, are best seen in T2WI. The term SCIWORA has been rendered inaccurate by MRI. The temporal profile of appearances of the injured cord has been well documented.[19],[20] It is now established in animal models that the extent of signal change shown on MRI is related to the severity of injury.[21] Clinical studies also have shown a general association between the extent of signal change on MRI and functional outcome.[7],[18],[22],[23] Marciello et al,[24] after analysing 24 cases of acute spinal cord injury with MRI, stressed the prognostic significance of the finding of intramedullary haemorrhage. While a normal looking cord had the best prognosis, the outcome progressively worsened with the findings of intramedullary oedema involving one or more segment of cord segment, and was worst with intramedullary haemorrhage.
Inspite of having clear-cut features of cervical myelopathy following trauma, MRI may occasionally show a normal spinal cord, as in two of our patients (including one with gunshot wound to the neck). Such patients have features of mild cord dysfunction, which usually recover within a short period. They have been diagnosed as having spinal cord concussion (SCC). It was hypothesised that SCC occurred due to functional disturbances of axonal membrane without disruption of structural integrity.[11] Zwimpfer and Bernstein[25] diagnose SCC when there is (a) no evidence of cervical canal stenosis, (b) spinal trauma precedes the onset of deficit, (c) neurological deficit is consistent with spinal cord involvement at the level of injury and (d) there is complete recovery within 72 hours. Subtle cord changes of oedema can be missed due to relatively poor spatial resolution and signal-to-noise ratio, and limited minimum slice thickness.[26],[27]
Management : Management of spinal cord injury without associated fracture or dislocation is essentially conservative. There is no role for traction. In the three cases of such injury with quadriplegia reported by Laud and Ramani[28] where diffuse hyperintensity was seen on T2WI, wide laminectomy resulted in significant improvement in neurological grades. All, except one, patient in the present study showed improvement with conservative management. Recovery is good and most of the patients improve their neurological deficit over 4-12 weeks.


   »   Conclusion Top

Cervical cord injury without associated vertebral fracture or dislocation is rare in adults with normal spinal canals. The concept of cord injury by skeletal displacement in hyperflexion with spontaneous recoil is untenable. It appears that strain of the cervical spine in any direction can injure the cord. In hyperextension, the cord gets damaged due to compression, while in hyperflexion, rotatory acceleration and distraction, injury occurs due to a combination of stretching, tethering and vascular compromise. With increasing utilization of MRI in the evaluation of traumatic myelopathy, more cases of spine injury without radiological abnormality can be discovered and their natural history studied. Management is conservative and outcome is not as dismal as seen in injuries with cervical fracture or dislocations.

 

  »   References Top

1.Firooznia H, Jung H, Rafii M et al : Quadriplegia after minor trauma. The role of preexisting spinal stenosis. Surg Neurol 1985; 23 : 165 -168.   Back to cited text no. 1    
2.Benzel EC, Larson SJ : Functional recovery after decompressive spine operation for cervical spine fractures. Neurosurgery 1987; 20 : 742 -746.   Back to cited text no. 2    
3.Pang D, Wilberger JE Jr : Spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormalities in children. J Neurosurg 1982;57 : 114 -121.   Back to cited text no. 3    
4.Chirossel JP, Vanneuville G, Passagia JG et al : Biomechanics and classification of traumatic lesions of the spine. In, Lindsay Symon (Ed).Advances & Tech Standards in Neurosurgery Vol 22: Springer-Verlag Wien New York. 1995; 56 -137.   Back to cited text no. 4    
5.Lyness SS, Wagman AD : Neurological deficits following cervical manipulation. Surg Neurol 1974; 2 : 121-124.   Back to cited text no. 5    
6.Wilder BL : Hypothesis: The etiology of midcervical quadriplegia after operation with patient in the sitting position. Neurosurgery 1982; 11 : 530 -531.   Back to cited text no. 6    
7.Krueger BR, Okazaki H : Vertebral-basilar distribution infarction following chiropractic manipulation. Mayo Clin Proc 1989; 55 : 322-332.   Back to cited text no. 7    
8.Mehalic T, Farhat SM : Vertebral artery injury from chiropractic manipulation of the neck. Surg Neurol 1974; 2 : 125-129.   Back to cited text no. 8    
9.Taylor AR : The mechanism of injury to the spinal cord in the neck without damage to the vertebral column. J Bone Jt Surg 1951; 33B : 543-547.   Back to cited text no. 9    
10.Taylor AR, Blackwood W : Paraplegia in hyperextension cervical injuries with normal radiographic appearances. J Bone Jt Surg 1948; 30B : 245-249.   Back to cited text no. 10    
11.Kobrine AI : The neuronal theory of experimental traumatic spinal cord dysfunction. Surg Neurol 1975; 3 : 261-264.   Back to cited text no. 11    
12.Simpson RK Jr, Robertson DP, Narayan RK : Penetrating spinal cord injury. In, Narayan RK, Wilberger JE Jr, Povlishock JT (eds). Neurotrauma, McGraw-Hill Inc., New York. 1996; 1289-1300.   Back to cited text no. 12    
13.Allen AR : Surgery of experimental lesion of spinal cord equivalent to crush injury of fracture dislocation of spinal column. A preliminary report. JAMA 1911; 146 : 878-880.   Back to cited text no. 13    
14.Collins WF : A review and update of experimental and clinical studies of spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 1983; 21 : 204-219.   Back to cited text no. 14    
15.Tator CH, Fehlings MG : Review of the secondary injury theory of acute spinal cord trauma with emphasis on vascular mechanisms. J Neurosurg 1991; 75 : 15-26.   Back to cited text no. 15    
16.Senter HJ, Venes JL : Loss of autoregulation and post traumatic ischaemia following experimental spinal cord injury. J Neurosurg 1979; 50 : 198-216.   Back to cited text no. 16    
17.Maroon JC, Adnan AA, Wilberger JI : Central cord syndrome. Clin Neurosurg 1991; 37 : 612.   Back to cited text no. 17    
18.Flanders AE, Schaefer DM, Doan HT et al : Acute cervical spine trauma: correlation with degree of neurological deficit. Radiology1990; 177 : 25-33.   Back to cited text no. 18    
19.Gomori JM, Grossmann RI, Goldberg HI et al : Intracranial haematomas: Imaging by high field magnetic resonance at 1.5T. Radiology1985; 157 : 87-93.   Back to cited text no. 19    
20.Tavri OJ : MRI in spinal trauma. In, Ramani PS, Sharma A (eds). Modern trends in the management of Neurotrauma. Dept of Neurosurg, LTGM Hospital, Bombay. 1994; 171-174.   Back to cited text no. 20    
21.Fujii H, Yore K, Sakou I : Magnetic resonance imaging study of experimental acute spinal cord injury. Spine 1993; 18 : 2030-2034.   Back to cited text no. 21    
22.Silberstein M, Hennessey O : Implications of focal spinal cord lesions following trauma - evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging. Paraplegia 1993; 31 : 160-167.   Back to cited text no. 22    
23.Kulkarni MR, McArdle CB, Kapanick D : Acute spinal cord injury. MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1987; 164 : 837-843.   Back to cited text no. 23    
24.Marciello MA, Flanders AE, Herbison GJ et al : Magnetic resonance imaging related to neurologic outcome in cervical spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74 : 940-946.   Back to cited text no. 24    
25.Zwimpfer TJ, Bernstein M : Spinal cord concussion. J Neurosurg 1990; 72 : 894-900.   Back to cited text no. 25    
26.Mascalchi M, Dal Pozzo G, dini C et al : Acute spinal trauma: The prognostic value of MRI appearances at 0.5 T. Clin Radiol 1993; 48 : 100-108.   Back to cited text no. 26    
27.Voyvodic F, Dolinis J, Moore VM et al : MRI of car occupants with whiplash injury. Neuroradiology 1997; 39 : 35-40.   Back to cited text no. 27    
28.Laud NS, Ramani PS : Patterns of spinal injuries. In, Ramani PS (ed). Spinal Surgery Vol I. Dept of Neuro and Spinal Surgery, LTM Medical College, Mumbai. 1996; 185-192.   Back to cited text no. 28    

 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
Previous article Next article
Online since 20th March '04
Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow